“A pretty pathetic attempt at branding an opponent to your religion as a pedophile.”
Your post is a pretty pathetic attempt at branding my post as an attempt to brand him as a pedophile. I never said he was a pedophile. I said I wondered what the consent age was and if he was a statutory rapist. Both questions are legitimate under the circumstances.
“Your post is a pretty pathetic attempt at branding my post as an attempt to brand him as a pedophile.”
Your reply is a pretty pathetic attempt to have it both ways. To accuse someone of being a statutory rapist of an underage girl with no evidence, and wresting this from a partial quote from his book when he was still a young priest, is rather disgusting and underhanded.
You should stick with dealing with all the Catholic Priests the RCC shuffles around wh oare actually pedophiles.
Also you should do something about the molestation of Korans by elderly Popes.