Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MegaChurch or Catholic Church?
taylormarshall.com ^ | August 26, 2013 | Dr. Taylor Marshall

Posted on 08/27/2013 11:53:37 AM PDT by NYer

Megachurch. Two young ladies. Both had left the Catholic Church. Both were now attending “megachurches.” We had a good chat together. I wanted to understand their reasons for why they left the Catholic Church for a megachurch.

megachurches

Joel Osteen’s Lakewood Megachurch
43,500 weekly attendance

I was at the bank and somehow I got into a spiritual conversation with two Hispanic executives that worked there.

Why the Megachurch?

When I asked why they exchanged the Catholic Church for the megachurch, they gave me a number of reasons:

  1. “My new church has an iPhone app. I can go on my iPhone and get Bible studies, sermons (video and audio). When I travel I can still watch the sermon, either live or later. I feel apart of the community.”
  2. “The preaching is dynamic and speaks to my life. I find practical encouragement.”
  3. “I felt judged at the Catholic Church.”
  4. “People were not friendly or welcoming at the Catholic Church. The first time I went to my new church, I was welcomed by so many people.”
  5. “My new church has classes and courses that are interesting and helpful.”
  6. “The music is better.”
  7. “In the Catholic Church, they use a lot of words that I did not understand.”
  8. “People pray for each other and know each other (in the megachurch).”

Although these two ladies didn’t articulate it explicitly to me, I could tell that they were very proud of their new churches. I could also discern in them a surprise that I am so “spiritual” and yet I am very excited about being Catholic. They assumed the “with it” people were leaving Catholicism for the bigger and better and deal.

I asked them what they miss about being Catholic. They replied with two answers:

  1. “There are not any crosses in my new church. I know it makes some people feel uncomfortable, but I wish we had crosses.”
  2. “What will I do when I die?” They were both unclear about whether they could get anything like Last Rites at the megachurch.

What About the Eucharist?

I asked both about the Eucharist: “Don’t you miss the Eucharist?”

This question didn’t phase them one bit. “Oh we still have communion. They pass out little crackers and cups of juice. I like this better because I thought drinking from one big cup is icky. Spreads germs.”

“But in the Catholic Church,” I replied, “we believe that the Eucharist is the real Body and Blood of Jesus?”

I may as well have said, “Don’t you know that there are Martians in my back pocket.” She was unaware that the Catholic Church taught this. No idea.

The Problem

This, my brothers and sisters, is the crux of the problem. These girls were raised as Catholics, but did not know about the Eucharist. They did not know that the Eucharist is God. They did not understand the Holy Eucharist is the center of the Catholic tradition.

So when they compare our ho-hum Catholic music and pedestrian sermons to snazzy well produced musical productions and highly polished bulleted sermons from handsome professional speakers…where are they going to go?

If they had believed that the Holy Eucharist is truly the Lord Jesus Christ, then they would have stayed. This is the task of the New Evangelization if there is going to be one. Can we communicate the mystery of Eucharist. If we fail in that, everyone is leaving the building.

Godspeed,
Taylor

PS: I don’t mean to suggest that having the Holy Eucharist is an excuse for bad music, bad vestments, bad architecture, and bad sermons. The Eucharist is like a precious diamond. It deserves a platinum setting…not a plastic setting. We can’t say, “Well, we have the Eucharist – so you’re forced to stay and have a miserable experience every Sunday.” We can’t keep the sacraments hostage to mediocracy.

PPS: With 1 billion strong, the Catholic Church is the real megachurch!

pope visit

Pope Francis at Rio de Janeiro
3 million people



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholic; joelosteen; megachurch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,461-1,478 next last
To: SoothingDave

It merely walked like a duck and quacked like one.


301 posted on 08/28/2013 5:03:24 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Oh my Jesus forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell and lead all souls to heaven, especially those in need of thy mercy. Amen.

I'm thinking your religion should change the prayer to this:

Oh my Jesus forgive me my sins, save me from the fires of hell and lead my soul to heaven, especially me, in need of thy mercy. Amen.

You guys may not consider that to be a significant change but I am convinced that it makes all the difference in the world to God...

So, you change a prayer asking for mercy for "us" (i.e. others and me) to one asking for mercy just for "me."

And you think the selfish version is better approved by God?

That does indeed say a lot. Enjoy your own personal savior.

302 posted on 08/28/2013 5:21:28 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Pagan is pagan.

If we are criticised for having Christmas trees, you can’t escape criticism for wedding bands.

Pagan is pagan. Either pagan things can be used for good, or they should be eschewed entirely.


303 posted on 08/28/2013 5:23:47 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Wedding rings are not pagan. The pagans got the ideas from the Jews.

Look up Jewish wedding customs and traditions. WHY do you think God points us to the Jewish wedding so often?


304 posted on 08/28/2013 5:27:23 AM PDT by Truth2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

One wonders if any of these here have ever cutseyed and if they consider that to be worship forbidden by the commandment.


305 posted on 08/28/2013 5:28:01 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Although Mary is the Mother of God, she is not his mother in the sense that she is older than God or the source of her Son’s divinity, for she is neither. Rather, we say that she is the Mother of God in the sense that she carried in her womb a divine person—Jesus Christ, God "in the flesh" (2 John 7, cf. John 1:14)—and in the sense that she contributed the genetic matter to the human form God took in Jesus Christ.

Yes. These words have a meaning.

Like I have long said, "scratch a Maryphobe and find a deficient Christology." They go hand-in-hand.

306 posted on 08/28/2013 5:30:01 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Truth2012
Look up Jewish wedding customs and traditions.

Sorry. Sola scriptura.

307 posted on 08/28/2013 5:31:41 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Rather, we say that she is the Mother of God in the sense that she carried in her womb a divine person—Jesus Christ, God "in the flesh" (2 John 7, cf. John 1:14)—and in the sense that she contributed the genetic matter to the human form God took in Jesus Christ.

It takes on an even greater significance when you consider some recent scientific findings.

Microchimerism is the persistent presence of a few genetically distinct cells in an organism. This was first noticed in humans many years ago when cells containing the male “Y” chromosome were found circulating in the blood of women after pregnancy. Since these cells are genetically male, they could not have been the women’s own, but most likely came from their babies during gestation.

Scientists Discover Children’s Cells Living in Mothers’ Brains

308 posted on 08/28/2013 5:35:38 AM PDT by NYer ( "Run from places of sin as from the plague."--St John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Just wanted to give you another quick note in reply to this post, metmom, before moving on to my other responsibilities for today.

Those "Bible Hub" links you provided in your post are great resources! Thanks for sharing them with me!

(I have a book version of "Strong's Exhaustive Concordance", and it is difficult to lift it, let alone find stuff in it!)    :-)

I think you are on the right track in your reasoning about these matters, but just haven't taken them far enough yet.    The meaning of that commandment is that we should not make idols of other gods, or worship those idols (if someone else made them).    The "cross images" one sees in the front of most Protestant churches are NOT made or believed to be idols, and when the congregation kneels in prayer while facing those crosses in the front, they are NOT worshiping those cross images.

You just have to extend that idea further to the truth that the statues you see in Catholic churches are NOT made or seen as "idols" or "gods" either, and when people kneel in prayer in front of those statues, they are NOT worshiping them either, or seeing them as "idols" or "gods", but rather, just simple images like the Protestant cross images.

The Catholic Church teaches that we should only worship God, and we should not make or use idols of any kind.    That is the simple truth, whether one chooses to believe it or not.

Have a great day, metmom!

309 posted on 08/28/2013 5:49:22 AM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; metmom
I'm sorry, CB. I must not have understood what you said.

Now, to make myself clear, the Catholic doctrine forbids adoration of statues, images, or of any being or person other than Almighty God. The same goes for all other Christian denominations of which I am aware.

All of us believe n adoration of the Creatror alone; never the creature. Any assertion to the contrary is based on ignorance ---I hope. No Christians are polytheist: I suppose that's a tautology, since it is implied in the definition of Christian.

I am at a lost how to explain the very, very small subset of people on FR who don't get this; who misinterpret all of the common forms of religious veneration found in the Bible, as adoration. I assume you understand the difference between the two, as they occur so frequently in the Bible --- Abigail prostrating to David; David bowing to the Temple; Solomon bowing low to Bathsheba --- and yet you continue to misinterpret them when done by Christians, after it has been explained to them exhaustively. ("Exhaustively" --- THAT is the word.

So I must close my portion of the discussion, on which I have probably spent too much time.

If my toast is now blackened --- OK, it's a burnt offering. Good day to you and to all.

BTW, I m having a computer screen problem --- letters displayed almost illegibly --- so this may or may not signal the end of my FR activity for awhile, unless my husband figures out how to fix it! If you're a praying person, pray :o)

310 posted on 08/28/2013 5:57:15 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("In Christ we form one body, and each member belongs to all the others." Romans 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
fwdude wrote:

Even if I were advocating “sola scriptura” that would not excuse the blatant violation of scripture.

Hm. Well... assuming that you're *not* advocating "sola Scriptura" (and I'm not yet sure that you aren't, frankly): how, exactly, do you decide on what entails a "violation of Scripture"? Do you have logical standards by which you do this, or do you go by personal feelings/tastes?
311 posted on 08/28/2013 6:18:41 AM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I say that the claim that 94% of the people in Mexico were baptized in the Catholic Church, is almost certainly wrong.

Pew (Pew Link Here) says 84%.

CIA World Factbook (CIA link here) says 82%.

So my present best guess is 82%.

I've got to get my computer screen fixed, because it;s almost illegible. My husband says it's not the monitor, it's the hard drive, and he's going to try to fix it. Bye!

312 posted on 08/28/2013 6:23:50 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("In Christ we form one body, and each member belongs to all the others." Romans 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Here’s where the confusion comes in. What’s forbidden is bowing in adoration; not bowing as a sign of honor or respect.

Not just that...Are you guys serving Mary???

313 posted on 08/28/2013 6:25:04 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
Lots of people take communion in remembrance of what Jesus did on the cross.

Catholics don't have a corner on the market.

They are the only ones, however, who claim to be doing it the *right* way, which is basically according to their teaching.

However, that teaching violates a whole bunch of other Scripture, therefore their interpretation of that verse is wrong and Jesus Himself even clarified when He said that the flesh profits nothing. It's the SPIRIT that gives life.

Don't eat blood. The life is in the blood.

Genesis 9:4 But you shall not eat flesh with its life , that is, its blood.

Leviticus 3:17 It shall be a statute forever throughout your generations, in all your dwelling places, that you eat neither fat nor blood.”

Leviticus 7:26-27 Moreover, you shall eat no blood whatever, whether of fowl or of animal, in any of your dwelling places. Whoever eats any blood, that person shall be cut off from his people.”

Leviticus 17:10-14 “If any one of the house of Israel or of the strangers who sojourn among them eats any blood, I will set my face against that person who eats blood and will cut him off from among his people. For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life. Therefore I have said to the people of Israel, No person among you shall eat blood, neither shall any stranger who sojourns among you eat blood.

“Any one also of the people of Israel, or of the strangers who sojourn among them, who takes in hunting any beast or bird that may be eaten shall pour out its blood and cover it with earth. For the life of every creature is its blood: its blood is its life. Therefore I have said to the people of Israel, You shall not eat the blood of any creature, for the life of every creature is its blood. Whoever eats it shall be cut off.

Leviticus 19:26 “You shall not eat any flesh with the blood in it. You shall not interpret omens or tell fortunes.

Deuteronomy 12:16 Only you shall not eat the blood ; you shall pour it out on the earth like water.

Deuteronomy 12:23 Only be sure that you do not eat the blood, for the blood is the life , and you shall not eat the life with the flesh.

Deuteronomy 15:23 Only you shall not eat its blood; you shall pour it out on the ground like water.

Acts 15:12-29 And all the assembly fell silent, and they listened to Barnabas and Paul as they related what signs and wonders God had done through them among the Gentiles. After they finished speaking, James replied, “Brothers, listen to me. Simeon has related how God first visited the Gentiles, to take from them a people for his name. And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written,

“‘After this I will return, and I will rebuild the tent of David that has fallen; I will rebuild its ruins, and I will restore it, that the remnant of mankind may seek the Lord, and all the Gentiles who are called by my name, says the Lord, who makes these things 18 known from of old.’

Therefore my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God, but should write to them to abstain from the things polluted by idols, and from sexual immorality, and from what has been strangled, and from blood. For from ancient generations Moses has had in every city those who proclaim him, for he is read every Sabbath in the synagogues.”

Then it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with the whole church, to choose men from among them and send them to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. They sent Judas called Barsabbas, and Silas, leading men among the brothers, with the following letter:

“The brothers, both the apostles and the elders, to the brothers who are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia, greetings. Since we have heard that some persons have gone out from us and troubled you with words, unsettling your minds, although we gave them no instructions, it has seemed good to us, having come to one accord, to choose men and send them to you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. We have therefore sent Judas and Silas, who themselves will tell you the same things by word of mouth. For it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay on you no greater burden than these requirements: that you abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from what has been strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well. Farewell.”

314 posted on 08/28/2013 6:26:16 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
aMorePerfectUnion wrote:

What other source has salvific truth that is not found in the Scriptures, but is necessary for salvation? What is that non-Scriptural truth that is necessary?

Perhaps the Church Jesus founded (Matthew 16:18-20, 1 Tim 3:15, etc.), as well as Sacred Tradition (2 Thes 2:15, 2 Thes 3:6, etc.)?

But more to your specific point: if "sola Scriptura" says "if it isn't in the Bible, don't trust it with matters of salvation!", and if "sola Scriptura" is not in the Bible (which it isn't), then "sola Scriptura" says not to trust "sola Scriptura". Right?

So... if you're a student of logic, you'll drop "sola Scriptura" like a hot potato, since it's insane to believe in a self-contradiction (e.g. like believing in a whole number that's even and odd at the same time); and if you're a faithful follower of "sola Scriptura", you'll dutifully obey it, and refuse to trust "sola Scriptura" with matters of salvation.

Does that clarify?
315 posted on 08/28/2013 6:27:03 AM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: paladinan
...how, exactly, do you decide on what entails a "violation of Scripture"? Do you have logical standards by which you do this, or do you go by personal feelings/tastes?

Well, the Bereans, whom Paul praised, seemed to have the answer.

316 posted on 08/28/2013 6:28:44 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest
The REAL truth is that "bowing down" does not always mean "worshiping", and "worshiping" does not always mean "bowing down".

I didn't say that it did.

However, the clear command by God is to NOT BOW DOWN.

317 posted on 08/28/2013 6:28:48 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: metmom
However, that teaching violates a whole bunch of other Scripture, therefore their interpretation of that verse is wrong and Jesus Himself even clarified when He said that the flesh profits nothing.

This is my body, which will be given up for you. It profits nothing.

What an odd interpretation. Do you really think Jesus was saying his body would achieve nothing?

Why was He Incarnated if the flesh gets Him (and us) nothing?

318 posted on 08/28/2013 6:30:33 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
And you think the selfish version is better approved by God?

I not only showed the scripture where God not only authorized it, he encourages it...

Luk_18:13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.

You guys don't care much for what God says, do ya???

That does indeed say a lot. Enjoy your own personal savior.

I certainly hope it does...And I do...

319 posted on 08/28/2013 6:31:17 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Mrs. Don-o
However, the clear command by God is to NOT BOW DOWN.

Mrs don-o has shown you numerous Scriptural citations where people did indeed bow down. Did you read them?

Perhaps it is not about posture, but about what is in the heart?

It's that that you really have a problem with. The fact that Catholics remember and revere the work God has done in other people. And that we are community.

320 posted on 08/28/2013 6:33:40 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,461-1,478 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson