Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear
[the Church] teaches something the apostles did not which constitutes “another gospel”

Veneration of saints does not constitute another gospel because it is fully compatible with the gospel. Luther, Knox, Calvin, Smith -- these are other gospels. Go, condemn them.

1,740 posted on 09/14/2013 7:30:56 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1651 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
>> Veneration of saints does not constitute another gospel because it is fully compatible with the gospel.<<

Ok, so you can’t show where the apostles taught it ey? I suppose the assumption of Mary is as well? I say, accursed to the preacher who teaches the lies of the RCC.

1,758 posted on 09/14/2013 12:42:05 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1740 | View Replies ]

To: annalex
Veneration of saints does not constitute another gospel because it is fully compatible with the gospel.

Sure it is: the Reformed Gospel®.

1,772 posted on 09/14/2013 2:29:08 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1740 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson