Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: bkaycee
Luther Agreed with Jerome that the deuterocanonical were OK for reading but were not God Breathed Scripture.

Neither one had authority to unilaterally edit the received Scriptures.

Only a Church Council, or the pope, had the authority to determine the canon of Scripture.

1,436 posted on 07/20/2013 5:38:00 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1434 | View Replies ]


To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Pope Gregory the Great, did not believe Maccabees was scripure


1,438 posted on 07/20/2013 5:43:38 PM PDT by bkaycee (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Pope Gregory the Great In his commentary on Job, Book 19, chapter 34, he says that it is not irregular to quote for the church’s edification the books of the Apocrypha, as long as it is understood that they are not canonical. He then immediately retells the story from 1 Macc. 6:42-47 concerning the death of Eleazar Savaran, who killed an elephant, though being killed in the process. Gregory’s exact words are these: “De qua re non inordinate agimus, si ex libris, licet non canonicis, tamen ad aedificationem ecclesiae editis, testimonium proferamus” (emphasis added). The translation already linked renders it: “With reference to which particular we are not acting irregularly, if from the books, though not Canonical, yet brought out for the edifying of the Church, we bring forward testimony.” What immediately follows is from Maccabees. So, if Trent is correct in anathematizing all who reject the Apocrypha, then they have retroactively anathematized one of their own popes:

http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/a-pope-rejects-maccabees/


1,439 posted on 07/20/2013 5:47:37 PM PDT by bkaycee (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas; bkaycee
Only a Church Council, or the pope, had the authority to determine the canon of Scripture.

And just who decided THAT?

Especially, who initially decided that?

1,442 posted on 07/20/2013 5:59:41 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Only a Church Council, or the pope, had the authority to determine the canon of Scripture.

I know this is a bit before your time; but just WHO had 'authority' to compile the OT together?

1,454 posted on 07/20/2013 6:39:51 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas; Elsie; All
Only a Church Council, or the pope, had the authority to determine the canon of Scripture.

(Church leaders only confirmed what was already treated authoritatively due to its linkages to the apostles and Paul)

The early church fathers (97-180) quoted from 28 of the 29 New Testament books. In fact, EVERY New Testament book was referenced pre-150 except Philemon and 3 John. The 170 A.D. Muratorian Canon had only excluded Hebrews, James, and 3 John. [And if Catholics want to make that an issue, they should talk...given that their first canonization of the Apocrypha came in 1546...and they didn't canonize dead saints until 995]

The Holy Spirit canonized the Bible; the Church merely received it -- reaffirming what the early church Fathers had already recognized in their writings as authoritative [for example, Hippolytus recognized 22 books his writings...he lived 170-235]

Irenaeus cited 21 of these books...Polycarp, a disciple of the apostle John, acknowledged 15 books.

1,465 posted on 07/20/2013 9:03:09 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson