Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: Elsie
We are over 7150 replies later and STILL no Catholic seems to have an answer for this:

Then just WHO is going to RISE FROM THEIR tombs at the end?

741 posted on 07/15/2013 8:00:09 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

You lose!

The Two Babylons contains all of the quotes, and a huge bibliography, all of which is on file at Oxford for your perusal.

The only people resisting the well researched truth in The Two Babylons are those that reject Yeshua, and are no part of his kingdom.


742 posted on 07/15/2013 8:00:48 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Obama’s zombies?

They all have Rosary beads.


743 posted on 07/15/2013 8:02:37 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
>> I don’t see much point in discussing scripture with a non-trinitarian.<<

Show from any post of mine where I denied believing in the Trinity. If you can’t I would suggest you stop such scurrilous injections into what I believe.

744 posted on 07/15/2013 8:02:53 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“a huge bibliography, all of which is on file at Oxford for your perusal.”

Most of which was identified 150 years ago as a complete fabrication. Most of his ‘citations’ either do not exist or were distortions of what were actually written.

It was already done. By actual biblical protestant scholars.

Again, do you really think that Semiaramis was a soprano and that there exists historical evidence to this fact? C’mon. Be honest here.


745 posted on 07/15/2013 8:03:14 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

“Show from any post of mine where I denied believing in the Trinity. If you can’t I would suggest you stop such scurrilous injections into what I believe.”

You said you rejected Nicaea. That, makes you not a Christian. Now, it might make you a mormon or a witness, but there’s a bright line there.


746 posted on 07/15/2013 8:04:38 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; CynicalBear

>> “I don’t see much point in discussing scripture with a non-trinitarian.” <<

.
It is my studied observation that you eschew the discussion of scripture in general.


747 posted on 07/15/2013 8:05:23 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; CynicalBear

Those that do not reject Nicea will not see Yehova’s rest.


748 posted on 07/15/2013 8:07:10 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

So the ancient documents in the library at Oxford are fabrication?

You’re a hoot!


749 posted on 07/15/2013 8:08:52 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

“I did not expect, and was actually surprised, that you would post that level of information on a public website for all to see.”

So then why did you ask a question for which you did not expect an answer?

“You were certainly free to turn me down”

I didn’t because I believe, firmly, in accountability. I really am a Catholic. I go to church in Austin at St. Ignatius. With the time and stuff, you could even come and visit if you wanted to.

It’s no secret! I understand your apprehension - however, you did open this can of worms by asking the questions that you did.

“it was incredibly foolish given our current government’s data-collecting activities”

Well, ok. Obama wants to arrest me, he’s quite welcome!


750 posted on 07/15/2013 8:09:11 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I’m saying that Hislop’s citation of these ‘ancient documents’ are by and large a fabrication.

Again, this was proven 150 years ago. It’s fanciful, well-crafted elaborate fairy tales unworthy of further study and speculation.


751 posted on 07/15/2013 8:11:07 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

One who is willing to reject the Trinity has greater issues than the authority of scripture.


752 posted on 07/15/2013 8:11:45 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
...why did you ask a question for which you did not expect an answer?

Consider it a test.

I didn’t [turn you down] because I believe, firmly, in accountability. I really am a Catholic. I go to church in Austin at St. Ignatius. With the time and stuff, you could even come and visit if you wanted to.

An admirable sentiment, and an honest invitation. You never know when I might take you up on it.

I understand your apprehension - however, you did open this can of worms by asking the questions that you did.

Indeed I did. Touche.

Well, ok. Obama wants to arrest me, he’s quite welcome!

I'll shake your hand gladly and save a place for you in the holding cell, should it happen. Look for a guy humming cartoon theme songs on the back bench - it'll probably be me.

753 posted on 07/15/2013 8:16:52 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("...Someone handed the keys to the Forum to the OPC and its sympathizers...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

STOP IT!! STOP making this thread about me. Cursing, flagrantly disobeying the rules - what are you doing here anyway?


754 posted on 07/15/2013 8:19:21 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

The trinity is not a doctrinal issue in God’s word.

The Father, Son, and Spirit exist, but so what?

Other than the erroneous call in Acts regarding baptism that is found in later manuscripts, there is no trinity issue at all.

Perhaps catholics want to tie trinity to the pagan three finger pope salute?

Who knows.


755 posted on 07/15/2013 8:21:56 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

How can a citation of a document be fabrication?

The volumes do exist, and the quoted passages therein are completely accurate, so where is the fabrication?


756 posted on 07/15/2013 8:23:49 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

>> “ what are you doing here anyway?” <<

.
That should be obvious to you by now!


757 posted on 07/15/2013 8:24:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

“An admirable sentiment, and an honest invitation. You never know when I might take you up on it.”

Well, cool. Let me know if you’re ever in town.


758 posted on 07/15/2013 8:30:07 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

The fact that they don’t say what he claims they do? They don’t say anything of the sort?


759 posted on 07/15/2013 8:31:23 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Making friends?


760 posted on 07/15/2013 8:31:46 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson