Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: Elsie
It appears that the Pillar and Ground of the Truth is the Living GOD.

Nice try. I almost see your point but, no, the term "Living God" is part of a prepositional phrase to which the following reference to 'ground and pillar' refers. There is a comma after 'Living God'.

P.S. I am Orthodox, not Roman.

701 posted on 07/15/2013 7:08:03 PM PDT by newberger (Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion; daniel1212

As do I. Invaluable contributions and truly appreciated.


702 posted on 07/15/2013 7:08:21 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl; Iscool; daniel1212
.Sorry but we know better...And so do you, I'm sure...You want to show us in the scriptures where Mary is sinless??? You want to show us where Peter became a pope, or even suggested such a thing, or where purgatory is???

Your opinion and your opinion only. -bg

Not just his, but any "Christian" should be seeking the answers to those questions. The sure signs of a cult are when you are teaching your followers NOT to seek truth. Human nature is to follow the leader...

BUT, Christ is the leader and His Holy Spirit is the guide. The ONLY intercessor is Christ Jesus and Mary was just a chosen vessel, and is no more "holy" than any other human today or ever!

Matthew 16:23 Jesus turned and said to Peter, "get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns."

Nothing changes much!

703 posted on 07/15/2013 7:10:13 PM PDT by WVKayaker ("...the press had better learn from their experiences of being duped "...-Sarah Palin 5/17/13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Hmmm. You would ask that :-). I have been listening to a long series of podcasts on bishops in the church but I can’t remember the detail. I’ll try to find out and get back to you.


704 posted on 07/15/2013 7:10:20 PM PDT by newberger (Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; aMorePerfectUnion

Thank God for the encouragement. He is worthy.


705 posted on 07/15/2013 7:16:58 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Picking a date in the past is not prophecy...

You’re really grasping at thin air. Carry on.


706 posted on 07/15/2013 7:17:35 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: Repeat Offender

“Completely unScriptural. No need for a saint to do this. In fact the Scriptural revelation to Paul is that the Holy Spirit does this for us.”

The Holy Spirit helps us to pray. Prays besides us.

Scripture itself says that Prayer is efficacious and we are commanded to pray for one another.

Again, the root of the problem is that you don’t believe in the communion of saints, which is in the Apostle’s Creed.

“why would we want the saints to intercede for us?”

That’s a good question. Saints are our brothers and sisters, many of whom have suffered in similar ways as we did. They understand and the know what we are going through. They are also models for the faith whom we are called to emulate.

My patron is St. Hilary of Tours. Occasionally I will ask him to pray for me. More often I will ask St. Therese (who’s a wonderful and very holy lady), and Mary sometimes too.

“The answer is we wouldn’t because there is no need to.”

So your faith has a utilitarian ethos?

“Praying to the saints is a false belief”

Indeed, which is why Catholics don’t pray to Saints.

“puts others (some perceived saint) in front of God the Father.”

Some perceived saint. Is it not said by your side that all believers (save Catholics, natch), are saints?

“However, nowhere does it say anything about praying to a saint”

Again, something which Catholics do not do.

“Now, did Jesus say pray to the saints, or did He always say to pray to the Father? As in directly to the Father?”

Did Jesus say, “don’t ask the saints in heaven to pray for you?”

If not, why then do you believe this? Someone taught you this.

“asked a flesh and blood minister (prophet, priest, friend) to pray for them.”

So if intercession is permitted then I don’t see how intercession by the saints in heaven is forbidden. Arguing that the ‘Saints are dead’ is contrary to our hope in the resurrection of Christ and that the dead are not the dead, but the living. Christ himself says this!

“There is no reason”

Again, Catholics do not teach this.

“there is no need”

Again, a utilitarian ethos. This is the problem. You’re saying we should only do what is ‘needed’ without asking the question - how do you know what God wants? Are you God?

“it still doesn’t say pray for each other and ask some saint to pray also.”

Where does it say that one ceases praying for one another in heaven?

“We can pray directly to God the Father, and our only needed or directed intercession siteth on the Right Hand of God the Father in Heaven - the only begotten Son.”

Ok, great. You do that. what gives you the authority to demand that others do as you wish because you believe it’s ‘unnecessary’. Does God say it is unnecessary or do you say this?

“Praying to a saint or needing a Heavenly intercession other than Jesus is not Scriptural.”

There’s that word, again. A utilitarian ethos.

“In fact, it goes against Biblical teachings that Salvation and Heavenly intercession are through Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone.”

The bible does not actually say this. A mediator is not the same as an intercessor. This is yet another protestant interpolation.

“At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight. All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.”

I don’t see the word ‘intercession’ here anywhere.

“Christianity is not a chose your own adventure novel where you get to pick the wording and arrange things to mean what you want.”

Wise words from a protestant!


707 posted on 07/15/2013 7:19:38 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
OK, I found out a few things. To simplify things from my rapid search, it appears that the matter was defined / clarified by the Fifth-Sixth Council in Trullo in AD 692.

That name is used because that council created the canons for the previous Fifth and Sixth Ecumenical Councils.

No, I can't explain that further :-) Sorry.

708 posted on 07/15/2013 7:21:21 PM PDT by newberger (Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: newberger

I don’t believe the East ever had married bishops. Priests, yes, Bishops, no. :)

Clerical celibacy wasn’t standardized in the west until the Council of Elvira in the early 4th century. Prior to that, East and West would have had the same understanding regarding married priests and unmarried bishops.


709 posted on 07/15/2013 7:21:50 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
>> So you reject the Council of Nicaea as ‘paganism’?<<

Mixing paganism and Christianity is not to be supported.

710 posted on 07/15/2013 7:22:25 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: newberger

You are being ridiculous!

They were called nothing but synogogues.

They were a continuation of the ancient worship of Yehova, now fulfilled by the effective sacrifice of the Lamb of Yehova.

If you desire to worship a lie, be my guest!


711 posted on 07/15/2013 7:22:27 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
>>“all who wish to belong to the fold of Christ are placed under the dominion of Peter and his successors.”<<

Scriptural support for that please. Book, chapter, verse.

712 posted on 07/15/2013 7:24:06 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: newberger

Trullo concerned itself with clerical celibacy for priests and deacons. Not bishops. I just checked.


713 posted on 07/15/2013 7:24:19 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

rejecting the council of Nicaea = not a christian.


714 posted on 07/15/2013 7:24:50 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Why would an unbeliever care about what the gospels write?


715 posted on 07/15/2013 7:25:27 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 712 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Hislop is absolutely correct.

He fabricated nothing.

You grasp at straws.

Read the prophets where it is all recorded. (I know how much catholics hate the word, especially Torah and Tanakh)


716 posted on 07/15/2013 7:26:52 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

So Jesus expected Peter to act like Satan?


717 posted on 07/15/2013 7:27:30 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

I don’t see anything special about 100 AD to warrant basing your entire position on it.

Absence of evidence!= evidence of absence.

Affirmation of the doctrine of communion of saints has been proven back to the 4th century, with documents existing confirming it’s practice.

No documents exist confirming your opinion prior to Luther.


718 posted on 07/15/2013 7:28:13 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

“accept correction as discipline”.

Something else Jesus said.

That Peter was held to a higher standard of correction and rebuke is not evidence that he was of a lower status. Quite the opposite.


719 posted on 07/15/2013 7:29:25 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
The word “saint” comes from the Greek word hagios, which means “consecrated to God, holy, sacred, pious." It is almost always used in the plural, “saints.”

Do you consider yourself “consecrated to God”?

720 posted on 07/15/2013 7:29:56 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson