Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Here is an idea for the Church to trump the perverts.

Stop doing marriages & start doing “Christian unions between a man & a woman”, & call it that.

Stop sanctioning marriage, which has become meaningless. Let marriage be a solely government institution, bereft of an religious or spiritual meaning, much like a fishing license.

Create a new institution within the church joining together one man & one woman, until death do them part - no divorce possible, in a spiritual union recognized by the church, & limited to church members in good standing only.

If the couple wants to have a civil union too for tax purposes, that’s fine, but it has no relation to the Christian Union in the eyes of the Church & is meaningless to the Church.

Leave the perverts with their temporary, meaningless, secular unions they so deserve.

Change a few words & the Church can take back the meaning & purpose of marriage, while completely excluding the opinion of the bureaucrats.


15 posted on 06/27/2013 11:05:10 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mister Da

I agree with your comment that Christians need to rename and redefine what a Christian marriage actually is. Civil unions are formed for various legal reasons, they confer employment benefits and tax status, and they provide a form of self esteem to gay persons. A Christian marriage such as you described would provide spiritual value to Christians who submit to this form of marriage. Married Christians would provide salt and light to all who witness their marriages. The onus would be on all Christian married people to set as perfect examples as possible.


24 posted on 06/27/2013 12:10:59 PM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Mister Da

Maybe if more “Christians” lived up to their vows in the first place, we wouldn’t be in this mess.


25 posted on 06/27/2013 12:12:35 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Mister Da

Good idea.


39 posted on 06/27/2013 1:49:07 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson