Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
What we don’t see is the argument that Alex is making here. This is significant. If it were so, we would see it then. But we do not. We’re supposed to believe that a Church that has no existence whatsoever before John Knox has it right, while the Church that was in existence prior to Knox has it wrong.

You posts claims that I'm making "this argument", that I'm making it "here", and that you "don't see it". Maybe the reason no one can see it is that I haven't made it.

15 posted on 06/13/2013 10:39:08 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Alex Murphy

“You posts claims that I’m making “this argument”, that I’m making it “here”, and that you “don’t see it”. Maybe the reason no one can see it is that I haven’t made it.”

You have a definition of apostolicity that is contrary to what Ireneaus and Tertullian claimed. Hence the question.

When did this definition that you are advocating here first appear? Who was the first person to make this argument?


16 posted on 06/13/2013 10:41:12 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Un Pere, Une Mere, C'est elementaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson