An insult. Who is is insulting who with your name tag. Why we can take any writing into our own nonsense thoughts. I have been there and done it too out of eagerness. You think you are not acting like a lawyer at times. We isolated a word or verse from scripture or early church fathers. I came to the conclusion after reading it just goes on for its own sake after awhile. I hope the best for you. Peace in Christ.
“We isolated a word or verse from scripture or early church fathers.”
Indeed, you isolate a word out of its context, and then call me a lawyer just because I make a rational argument out of the entire work. If the flesh profiteth nothing in Christ’s explanation of “eating or drinking” Him, only the spirit quickeneth, how does it follow that eating the flesh and blood of Christ really DOES profit? Therefore, “to believe on Him whom God has sent” is to eat already, as that is the “work of God” that we are enjoined to do.
I came to the conclusion, after reading the article, the author is in fellowship with God and his brethren, seeking to communicate a litany of deceptive weaknesses in RCC theology, which misled him away from Christ. He seeks to clarify their omissions and commissions of sinful theology so that other new believers aren’t similarly misled.
He’s well qualified and experienced to report his witness and this is even more verified as he submits his testimony to the authority of God Himself revealed in His Word.
The writings of a man who decided to be his own magisterium of one. I’ll bet the true reason for his abandonment of the Truth is blonde, brunette or redhead.
Funny how protestants can decide their own papacy of one which becomes the singular papacy of each of them.
I think this has been posted before and his errancy is just as errant as it has ever been.