There is a disconnect between those who assume, based on the Creation as revealed in Genesis, that all the information necessary for the adaptation of species to the environment in which they live was present at the time of creation, and in the animals that were on the Ark,
versus those who assume that this information was added to the species through mutation over millions of years.
The latter belief is circular with no basis other than itself.
Adaption is a built in reality- natural selection is a biological reality- Science is finding out, more andm ore, that what they first thought was ‘new information’ arising in species was not new information at all, but a rekindlign of species specific information already present, but lyign dormant
The case of the ‘Nylon Eating Bacteria’ was heralded as a ‘modern exampel of thje rise of new “NON SPECIES SPECIFIC INFORMATION” (Gonna apply for a TM on this term) in a species but later it was discovered that the bacteria always had the ability to digest the materail, even though there was no nylon way back when, but the bacterai LOST the ability (but not the information) to digest the nylon- The bacteria had the special info to digest small circular protiens but had lsot the ability (but not the information) at soem point in it’s existence- A mutation comes along and resparks the info that was already present- the mutation did NOT CREATE the information- it only sparked the info already present- Mutations can ONLY work on info already present, it can NOT CREATE info out of thin air which woudl be absolutely necessary for the evoltuion of hte many species kinds aroudn today-
the ONLY iother possibility woudl be a scenario of lateral gene transference between DISSIMILIAR kinds- and we know from science that each species kind has several built in layers of defense to protect agaisnt this kind of gene transference which makes it an impossibility to even concider- once again
The impossibilites facing mega evolution hypothesis are far too great for nature to overcome- nature owudl have to be a SUPERNATURALLY INTELLIGENT DESIGNER and wouydl have to be capable of breakign it’;s own laws, not just in a few instances, but billions, perhaps trillions of times, in order to brign about mega-evolution- Marcopevolution is biologically impossible, chemically impossible, mathematically impossible, and to top it all off, it violates the second law of thermodynamics (soem argue that macro-evolution ‘coudl happen IF’ life evolved in an open system/universe [Apparently where the second law of thermodynamics is no logner valid accordign ot evoltuionists, but it’s been proven that in such an environment, it would make hte situation of evolution even more impossible]- but the FACT is that an open system woudl be even worse, not better, for evolution)