Posted on 05/12/2013 5:55:26 PM PDT by narses
Full Question
Until recently, I always thought Catholics worshiped on the Sabbath, and that the early Church moved the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. Is this true? Answer
This is a common misunderstanding. Catholics do not worship on the Sabbath, which according to Jewish law is the last day of the week (Saturday), when God rested from all the work he had done in creation (Gen. 2:2-3). Catholics worship on the Lords Day, the first day of the week (Sunday, the eighth day); the day when God said "Let there be light" (Gen. 1:3); the day when Christ rose from the dead; the day when the Holy Spirit came upon the Apostles (Day of Pentecost). The Catechism of the Catholic Church says: "The Church celebrates the day of Christs Resurrection on the eighth day, Sunday, which is rightly called the Lords Day" (CCC 2191).
The early Church did not move the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. Instead "The Sabbath, which represented the completion of the first creation, has been replaced by Sunday, which recalls the new creation inaugurated by the Resurrection of Christ" (CCC 2190). Sunday is the day Catholics are bound to keep, not Saturday.
We see evidence of this in Scripture:
On the first day of the week when we gathered to break bread, Paul spoke to them because he was going to leave on the next day, and he kept on speaking until midnight (Acts 20:7). On the first day of the week each of you should set aside and save whatever one can afford, so that collections will not be going on when I come (1 Cor. 16:2). Let no one, then, pass judgment on you in matters of food and drink or with regard to a festival or new moon or Sabbath (Col. 2:16). The Catechism also says:
By a tradition handed down from the apostles which took its origin from the very day of Christs Resurrection, the Church celebrates the Paschal mystery every seventh day, which day is appropriately called the Lords Day or Sunday. The day of Christs Resurrection is both the first day of the week, the memorial of the first day of creation, and the "eighth day," on which Christ after his "rest" on the great Sabbath inaugurates the "day that the Lord has made," the "day that knows no evening." (CCC 1166)
Other CCC references to the Lords Day: 349, 2174, 2175, 2191
Answered by: Peggy Frye
It shows Nisan 14 falling on a Friday. Whoop de doo! Why do you suppose Mr. Fotheringham used that date?
The Vernal Equinox (in the year 30 A.D.) fell on March 23rd at 12:49 A.M. Jerusalem time.
Coincidentally, the new moon also fell on the same day....which was a Thursday. If (as your calendar shows) the 14th was Friday....then the new moon would have been on a Saturday.
30 A.D. is known for the fact that the New Moon and the Equinox occurred on the same day. This happens about four times every 59 years.....so it's somewhat unusual.
It does not take a degree in mathematics to then count to 14 (including Thursday as day #1)...... to arrive at Passover, Wednesday the 14th, 30 A.D.
Since you don't know..... I'll explain something to you. Mr. Fotheringham was a charlatan.....doing nothing more than forcing his conclusions to fit the Main Stream narrative.
***I’ll explain something to you. Mr. Fotheringham was a charlatan****
It seems that everyone who does not agree with your personal fringe interpretation is automatically a charlatan, from the Eastern Greek church, who should know what the bible really says, to the Western Latin church, and all protestants for the last 600 years. I will stick with the scriptures as translated by REAL Greek scholars.
But now, there is this. According to the US Dept of Naval Observatory, Nisan 14 began about 10 PM Thursday, which would be Friday night by Jewish counting, Friday the day to follow. 30 AD.
The book PAGAN FESTIVALS IN CHRISTIAN WORSHIP by E.E. FRANKE (Church of God 7th Day),
then tries to claim the crucifiction was then in AD 31.
They really play up this Navy Observatory account in order to prove their hobby horse.
Fotheringham’s chronology and that of the US NAVAL Observatory agree as to when the 14 Nisan was for 30 AD. It was FRIDAY.
Got a link?
The book PAGAN FESTIVALS IN CHRISTIAN WORSHIP by E.E. FRANKE (Church of God 7th Day), then tries to claim the crucifiction was then in AD 31.
I would recommend you not pay too much attention to what these folks do..........and say.
By the way........Hebrew (Jewish) counting of the days is, i.e. Thursday night/Friday (THE SIXTH DAY). That's why when you see the 14th of Nisan listed as Wednesday on a modern calendar you automatically know that the actual beginning of the 14th was on Tuesday evening at sunset. 6 hours of the 14th is on Tuesday and the remainder (18 hours is on Wednesday.
***Got a link? ***
A link? I’m old style and just pull one of my books off the shelf. You know what a PRINT COPY is don’t you?
***I would recommend you not pay too much attention to what these folks do..........and say. ****
I have not found a bit of difference between what they believe and what you believe. Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, ect.
I repeat myself again.
Fotheringhams chronology and that of the US NAVAL Observatory agree as to when the 14 Nisan was for 30 AD. It was FRIDAY.
You seem to equate an heir with being in some kind of a contract.
It’s not.
A contract has at least two agents represented.
You can be an heir to some part of an estate without ANY input by yourself.
Where is it?
Acts 15 sure says NOTHING about a 'covenant'.
Well........that's kind of silly...to think that. Didn't you get the word? They believe (incorrectly) that the crucifixion/resurrection was in 31 A.D. and I thought that was the gist of your post!
Not too much similarity with what I believe....and I'll bet you a dime to a doughnut that they celebrate Pentecost yearly on a Sunday....like the Catholics say.....instead of Sivan 6 as the scriptures say.
***They believe (incorrectly) that the crucifixion/resurrection was in 31 A.D.****
Well, they decided on what day Jesus rose, then got the Naval Observatory info, then found a date on that chart that coincided with THEIR beliefs, and BINGO! That was the day in their doctrine Jesus rose.
Meanwhile I will still stick with REAL scholars on the subject. No harebrained off the wall schemes for me. AD 30 or AD 33 are the ones that fit the BIBLE.
No it wasn't! Both the Equinox and the new moon occurred on March 23:
As you can see........the Equinox and the New Moon coincided, and began the year. Now.....count 14 days from Thursday, Nisan 1, 30 A.D. and see where that brings you to.
Passover, Wednesday, Nisan 14, 30 A.D.
Now........instead copying some old dusty book, written by a charlatan, puttering around in his library back in the 1920's.......send me a link that shows my error. He was a Catholic (Eastern)! What would you expect him to say?
The conjunction occurred on March 22 and the visible crescent the next day.....and the full moon on April 6 which just happened to be Nisan 15, 30 A.D. and the First Sabbath of Unleavened Bread [Leviticus 23:6]. Passover was the day before...the 14th [Leviticus 23:5].
***No it wasn’t! Both the Equinox and the new moon occurred on March 23: ***
I’ll stick with the tried and true method and real Greek theologians.
***Now........instead copying some old dusty book, written by a charlatan, puttering around in his library back in the 1920’s***
Fotheringhams chronology and that of the US NAVAL Observatory (W.S. Eichelberger, U.S.N. Director, Nautical Almanac) agree as to when the 14 Nisan was for 30 AD. It was FRIDAY.
You mean......like Hillary has done with Benghazi?
LOL
Well..........you better write "timeanddate.com" and tell them to change their computer program so it fits the calculations of some old, crusty and forgotten Greek Orthodox Charlatan (circa 1920)..... who puttered around in his dusty old library conjuring up some song and dance about the date of Passover, which he probably had no idea as to how to arrive at such a date to begin with.
I had forgotten how gullible some folks could be on this subject when defending the "Faith"! LOL
Yawn.
>> “ The days of the week are simply known as first day, second day, third day, etc.” <<
.
No one has disputed that, to my knowledge, or are you just strawmanning?
‘Twas not 30 AD.
That date was strictly from the inept 3rd hand Greek translation by extrapolation of many errors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.