“Unfortunately for you - Sinaiticus and Vaticanus predate Jerome.”
Unfortunately for you, the scholarship of Jerome predates Sinaiticus and Vaticanus even if he is born later. The only thing those tell us is that they were included. What the scholars tell us is that they were included only because they were thought useful so far as edification is concerned, but not to be brought forward for the creation or defense of doctrine. That has been well proven over and over again, even if you ignore it. Same thing with witch craft and their contradictions with history and the scripture.
The same people you are quoting all argue for their inclusion.
I’m not sure what I can possibly add to that when you won’t accept the conclusion of your own sources.
“contradictions with history”
The only ‘contradiction’ is the assertion that the King of Babylon was not the same as the King of Assyria. Which is in fact what did happen. You need to study more history. Babylon took over from Assyria.