Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

there were many false “scripture” interpretations around at the time. The church knew that people could not afford the true hand written copies from the monastaries, hence, for their own protection, and to prevent heresies from spreading, they regulated reading material to the masses.


496 posted on 01/08/2013 6:14:32 PM PST by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]


To: terycarl; metmom; boatbums; Iscool
Wait, I thought you said “The Church kept scripture out of the hands of noone....”.

Then I showed you this proving they did just that.

“Canon 14. We prohibit also that the laity should be permitted to have the books of the Old or New Testament; unless anyone from motive of devotion should wish to have the Psalter or the Breviary for divine offices or the hours of the blessed Virgin; but we most strictly forbid their having any translation of these books.

Which specifically refers to ”the Old or New Testament”. Now you come up with “there were many false “scripture” interpretations around at the time.”? Are you kidding me? Canon 14 specifically states that ”We prohibit also that the laity should be permitted to have the books of the Old or New Testament”. Then it goes on to say we most strictly forbid their having any translation of these books”.. Canon 14 is not restricting copies or translations that were “false interpretations”. It denied them having “the books of the Old or New Testament” period. Something you denied and are now trying to somehow bamboozle us into believing something different than truth. It ain’t working with those of us who do know truth.

507 posted on 01/08/2013 7:10:06 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

To: terycarl
there were many false “scripture” interpretations around at the time. The church knew that people could not afford the true hand written copies from the monastaries, hence, for their own protection, and to prevent heresies from spreading, they regulated reading material to the masses.

But I thought you just said that the RCC didn't keep the Bible from the people.

for their own protection

riiiiiggghhhttt...

God keep us from those who would protect us from ourselves......

513 posted on 01/08/2013 7:51:30 PM PST by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

To: terycarl; CynicalBear

>> “ hence, for their own protection, and to prevent heresies from spreading, they regulated reading material to the masses.” <<

.
That is Nicolaitanism, and Yeshua declared that he hated it.

Catholic is “Religion,” and Yeshua is “The Way,” and never will the two meet.


526 posted on 01/08/2013 8:29:30 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

To: terycarl
there were many false “scripture” interpretations around at the time.

So THAT is where the SINLESSNESS of MAry started!

And her ASSUMPTION as well?

548 posted on 01/09/2013 12:22:00 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson