Maybe it’s because these churches were merely following cultural trends to begin with, and now that the cultural trends have changed, they are simply following the new ones (just as they followed the old ones).
You’ve heard the story of what happened when a German and American Baptist group met each other. The Americans thought it was scandalous that the German women drank beer. The Germans though it was scandalous that the American women wore make up.
Far too many churches in the past have jumped through scriptural hoops to prove their cultural bias is backed up by scripture. But, misusing scripture (even if for a just purpose) always ends up with bad results.
Because most church in the west have become nothing more than social clubs.
On changing culture; Calif prop 8 as it made it through the courts the original judge ruled it unconstitutional, and one of the reasons was that Biblical/Religious reasons for being against same sex marriage proves the bible was written for the sole purpose of establishing bigotry.
Denominations change ‘their’ rules/law because they can. It’s theirs and they have nothing to do about God.
God’s Word never changes! Jesus, The Word, didn’t come for the ‘religious’/denominations or did He start one either. Those who believe on HIM - believe ONLY in His Word. There are no man-made teachings in God’s Body of Believers - His church.
1 Thess 4:1-8 draws a line in the sand. It COMMANDS against sexual immorality and concludes by saying that those who reject this command have REJECTED God. Churches who allow for sexual immorality have rejected God.
What might be more insane than a faith actually changing the definition of marriage to include ‘gay marriage’ is to then only conduct same sex marriages if the state gives its permission. “Sorry Steve and Bill, our faith says it’s fine for you to get married, but our state still doesn’t, so no dice, fellas.”
Freegards
Your libertarian pro-homo boundries for the discussion are stupid. People can say what ever they want to say regarding what you claim is “tolerance” and embracing of sodomy in their churches. Christians can do and say what they want about their own religion and churches. You worry about your own and mind your own freaking business like a good free man would do recogonizing religous freedom in this country.
Noun: cowardice
1. The trait of lacking courage
Noun: appeasement
1. The act of appeasing (as by acceding to the demands of)
2. Political policy of trying to pacify a hostile country, e.g. by granting concessions
I think churches only do this because they are desperate for members and most of all money. They believe this is the way to get both in the door.
Not realizing if they just preached what the Bible says there would be no problem.
African Methodist Episcopal Church
The African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church
Alliance of Baptists
American Baptist Churches in the USA
Diocese of the Armenian Church of America
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
Christian Methodist Episcopal Church
Church of the Brethren
The Coptic Orthodox Church in North America
The Episcopal Church
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Friends United Meeting
Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
Hungarian Reformed Church in America
International Council of Community Churches
Korean Presbyterian Church in America
Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church
Mar Thoma Church
Moravian Church in America Northern Province and Southern Province
National Baptist Convention of America
National Baptist Convention, U.S.A., Inc.
National Missionary Baptist Convention of America
Orthodox Church in America
Patriarchal Parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church in the USA
Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends
Polish National Catholic Church of America
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
Progressive National Baptist Convention, Inc.
Reformed Church in America
Serbian Orthodox Church in the U.S.A. and Canada
The Swedenborgian Church
Syrian Orthodox Church of Antioch
Ukrainian Orthodox Church of America
United Church of Christ
The United Methodist Church
If there is any Church which supported abolishment, it is most likely to accept homosexual "marriages" in the future.
Gambling -- the same
Rock music is not a matter of dogma. If rock music praises God, it's very good. if it praises the devil, it's not good. If it's something in between, it depends. it's not more evil or less.
So, if a church/denomination "took a stand" against drinking and smoking or gambling, etc it is more likely to now change with the wind to allow "gay marriages"