Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/10/2012 9:27:49 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Churches that change with the times aren't Churches at all.

For example, seeing as Jesus drank wine, I doubt Churches that banned alchohol when prohibition was a popular thing were hearing from God.

2 posted on 12/10/2012 9:32:52 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Gone Galt, 11/07/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

No wonder Christianity is in decline in the West.


3 posted on 12/10/2012 9:34:20 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

What say you?


4 posted on 12/10/2012 9:36:36 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Drinking, gambling, rock music, etc. are not defined in the Bible as sins per se. Anything that comes between you and God is wrong and should be condemded but not necessarily as a sin. Anything in excess, ie that controls you, is bad.

Homosexuality is specifically denouced as a sin in the Bible. No amount of rewriting by-laws will change that. Churches that doing this are more interested in the present life of their church and placating the political winds.


5 posted on 12/10/2012 9:39:35 AM PST by dirtymac (Now is the for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Bylaws - about what’s sin or not..... how about just use the Bible


7 posted on 12/10/2012 9:41:20 AM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Having investigated this by talking to individuals who were leaders in churches at this time, and the current “senior” leaders of such churches (including PC, USA; whom I just left after decades of service; I have served as an elder, deacon, and even informally as a substitute pastor); the truth is painful, but hard to ignore. They simply don’t believe in God. They have a spiritual belief, but not one that is consistent with scripture. They do not believe that the Bible is the infallible Word of God, they believe it needs to be updated for “modern culture”. They do not believe in an unchanging God, an unchanging and absolute moral code, or in most cases in a literal hell. They believe in everything, and nothing. They will continue to cave on bylaws, until they are indistignuishable from the pagans.


9 posted on 12/10/2012 9:46:01 AM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
IMO, other seemingly benign changes are directly indicative of the move toward overt perversion being embraced.

The most pernicious of these is the music that has been tolerated in churches. We now have the lion's share of evangelical church congregations segregated by "traditional" worship and "contemporary" worship. Abominable. And much of the "contemporary" music featured in these services would make most Christians blush if performed in the sanctuary only 20 years ago.

I've also noticed that the contemporary worship services are incrementally preempting the traditional worship, with congregations feeling the need to have at least one "with it" piece in the service to placate the "emergent" crowd. Contemporary services are also vying for prime scheduling times as well. The conservative Baptist Church my mom attends has relegated the traditional worship service to 8:30 with the contemporary service winning the prominent 11:00 spot. The evangelical church I have been attending still have the traditional service at 11:00 (with a "rock" service held concurrently in another auditorium but with the sermon videoed in), but the early and evening services are both modern.

Go ahead and accuse me being "prudish," but this is exactly how the incremental move toward the heresy we are witnessing starts.

10 posted on 12/10/2012 9:46:44 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I suppose the reasons church people change their “by-laws” are as varied as people are themselves. The only binding “by-laws” for the “called out ones” are the precepts God as recorded in scripture and those haven’t changed ever. And never will.


11 posted on 12/10/2012 9:47:17 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Your basic questions are good ones...

Helpful FYI only... plz

Governing documents of churches - the "bylaws" ---
Don't (usually) include behavior checklists of the cultural "Do's and Dont's" -- what they are "FOR" and "AGAINST".... etc

They DO contain a commitment to Biblical Christian doctrine--
--OR--
(by omission-usually),,,,
A modified doctrinal statement that is NOT committed to the lifestyle encouraged through God's Word...

Enjoy your day--God bless.

12 posted on 12/10/2012 9:50:12 AM PST by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I submit that there is a difference between the acceptance of homosexuality in the (mainline mostly) church and the acceptance of other, previously unaccepted beliefs and behavior, such as no-fault divorce, unmarried cohabitation, separate entrances for men and women, praise bands with drums, pews with cushions, alcohol, smoking, universalism, the Social Gospel, etc.

It strikes me that in the case of homosexuality, more so than the others, that the Devil is openly and loudly and proactively banging on the door of the church, demanding to be let in. For most or all of the other issues, the acceptance was made (rather more) quietly, one person at a time, one church at a time, one instance at a time.

I don’t recall great debates over no-fault divorce, unwed cohabitation, and other sexuality-related issues. The acceptance came gradually and (more or less) quietly.

Having achieved success with no-fault marriage, the devil has now become more audacious and visible. He demands that the church publicly announce either its denial that homosexuality is sinful, or that take no action against this sin.

In the mainline denominations of the United Church of Christ, Presbyterian USA, Episcopal U.S., United Methodist, and Evangelical Lutheran, Satan has more or less won.


17 posted on 12/10/2012 9:54:57 AM PST by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

A lot of “Christians” have looked EVIL in the face, and embraced it.


21 posted on 12/10/2012 9:58:12 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadows of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
2 Timothy 4 (NKJV)

1 I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom:

2 Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching.

3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers;

4 and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.

5 But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.

26 posted on 12/10/2012 10:04:43 AM PST by OB1kNOb (On November 6th liberty was given the death penalty in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
So, if a church/denomination "took a stand" against drinking and smoking or gambling, etc, etc in the 1800's in its bylaws but now has since changed the bylaws on these, did those back in the 1800's really hear from God when they crafted those bylaws?

The prohibitions in place in the 1800s were driven by the same intent that we saw with the Pharisees in Scripture. If you can put a wall around God's law, it will prevent people from breaking the actual law. For example if you don't drink, you won't get drunk and that will cut down on fighting, adultery, etc.

Throw in the temperance movement, driven by many churches, whose desire was to clean up America, and you have the drive to demonize alcohol.

That being said, the move to do away with Biblical prohibitions against homosexuality in the church stem from a low view of scripture.

As an example, we were asked to look over a PCUSA church's website for a friend and see if there were any issues. Here is what we read:

The Scriptures of the Old and New Testament are God’s uniquely revealed and written Word, inspired by the Holy Spirit, and are authoritative in all areas of faith and life. We seek to understand and follow God’s Word—both Jesus Christ, the living Word of God, and the Scriptures, the written Word of God—by always interpreting any one part of Scripture in terms of the Scriptural witness as a whole, and with an appreciation of the social and cultural realities of the times during which God’s word was written and compiled. (emphasis mine)

Note the bold segment. Everything that in that well written paragraph was undermined by the bold portion. They see Scripture as being written during a less enlightened era. They don't see man's sin as never changing. In that one segment they can undermine God's law in any way they desire.

27 posted on 12/10/2012 10:05:12 AM PST by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

...follow the $$$$!


29 posted on 12/10/2012 10:06:07 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

End times apostacy.


33 posted on 12/10/2012 10:09:33 AM PST by crosshairs (The left's hatred for Christianity far exceeds the fear they should have for Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I think the question is, which of those things that you listed are clearly identified by the Bible as sin? Aside from homosexuality, which is identified as sin in both the Old and New Testaments, none of the others is identified as a sin. Drunkenness is listed as something to be avoided, but smoking, gambling, music? I think there are many things which churches have decided contributed to temptation (dancing, for example) or caused other problems for the individual or society (smoking, drugs, etc.), but that was a determination by man, not something from the Bible.

But the churches that are moving toward accepting homosexuality as normal, and approving gay marriage, are definitely in conflict with the Bible. THAT is the difference.

36 posted on 12/10/2012 10:12:38 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

BINGO!


38 posted on 12/10/2012 10:14:28 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Why are they changing? Pretty simple answer—the marketing of deviance by homowood and the old media monopoly is forcing them to change. Furthermore, homosexual power and rights is nothing new. You act as if Sodom and Gomorrah never existed. Homosexuals had all the rights that perverts today address and then some. Same in ancient Rome where, male homosexuals were allowed to buy, sell, use and trade young boys. Same-sex trafficking was in vogue. Some of us simply don’t want to return to what then was defined as civilization.


44 posted on 12/10/2012 10:21:10 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

In this case, the “church”, i.e., “the bride of Christ”, (She) who marries the spirit of the age will become a widow in the next.

Many in the church claim to be following God or say they are simply following the leading of the Holy Spirit in liberalizing church teaching or doctrine. Others in the church say they are adhering to the intent of the Holy Scriptures and are also following and accepting the leading, urging and prodding of the Holy Spirit. Put another way, has God’s Truth been revealed once and for all or is it a progressive revelation, ever moving, ever changing?

One thing is perfectly clear in my mind, God the Holy Ghost is NOT confused. One side is right and the other is wrong. May God have mercy upon them all.


47 posted on 12/10/2012 10:26:15 AM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

“What bylaw(s) is/are absolutely correct and never need to be changed?”

Well, there are at least ten I could think of...


48 posted on 12/10/2012 10:27:40 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson