Posted on 12/08/2012 2:24:39 PM PST by NYer
Do Catholics worship Mary? This question is as old as the Protestant Reformation itself, and it rests, like other disputed doctrinal points, on a false premise that has been turned into a wedge: the veneration of Mary detracts from the worship of Christ.
This seeming opposition between Mary and Christ is symptomatic of the Protestant tendency, begun by Luther, to view the entirety of Christian life through a dialectical lens – a lens of conflict and division. With the Reformation the integrity of Christianity is broken and its formerly coherent elements are now set in opposition. The Gospel versus the Law. Faith versus Works. Scripture versus Tradition. Authority versus Individuality. Faith versus Reason. Christ versus Mary.
The Catholic tradition rightly sees the mutual complementarity of these elements of the faith, as they all contribute to our ultimate end – living with God now and in eternity. To choose any one of these is to choose them all.
By contrast, to assert that Catholics worship Mary along with or in place of Christ, or that praying to Mary somehow impedes Christ’s role as “the one mediator between God and men” (1 Tim 2:5) is to create a false dichotomy between the Word made flesh and the woman who gave the Word his flesh. No such opposition exists. The one Mediator entrusted his mediation to the will and womb of Mary. She does not impede his mediation – she helps to make it possible.
Within this context we see the ancillary role that the ancilla Domini plays in her divine Son’s mission. Mary’s is not a surrogate womb rented and then forgotten in God’s plan. She is physically connected to Christ and his life, and because of this she is even more deeply connected to him in the order of grace. She is, in fact, “full of grace,” as only one who is redeemed by Christ could be.
The feast of Mary’s Immaculate Conception celebrates the very first act of salvation by Christ in the world. Redemption is made possible for all by his precious blood shed on the cross. Yet Mary’s role in the Savior’s life and mission is so critical and so unique that God saw it necessary to wash her in the blood of the Lamb in advance, at the first moment of her conception.
This reality could not be more Biblical: the angel greets Mary as “full of grace” (Luke 1:28), which is literally rendered as “already graced” (kecharitōmenē). Following Mary, the Church has “pondered what sort of greeting this might be” for centuries. The dogma of the Immaculate Conception, ultimately defined in 1854, is nothing other than a rational expression of the angel’s greeting contained in Scripture: Mary is “already graced” with Christ’s redemption at the very moment of her creation.
Because God called Mary to the unique vocation of serving as the Mother of God, it is not just her soul that is graced, as is the case for us when we receive the sacraments. Mary’s entire being, body and soul, is full of grace so that she may be a worthy ark for the New Covenant. And just as the ark of the old covenant was adorned with gold to be a worthy house for God’s word, Mary is conceived without original sin to be the living and holy house for God’s Word.
Thus Mary is not only conceived immaculately, that is, without stain of sin. She also is the Immaculate Conception. Her entire being was specifically created by God with unique privilege so that she could fulfill her role in God’s plan of salvation. “Free from sin,” both original and personal, is the necessary consequence of being “full of grace.”
Protestants claim that veneration of Mary as it is practiced by Catholics is not biblical. St. Paul encouraged the Corinthians to “be imitators of me, as I am of Christ” (1 Cor 11:1). Paul is not holding himself up as the end goal, but as a means to Christ, the true end. And if a person is imitated, he is simultaneously venerated.
If we should imitate Paul, how much more should we imitate Mary, who fulfilled God’s will to the greatest degree a human being could. Throughout her life she humbled herself so that God could be exalted, and because of this, Christ has fulfilled his promise by exalting his lowly mother to the seat closest to him in God’s kingdom.
Mary is the model of humility, charity, and openness to the will of God. She allows a sword to pierce her heart for the sake of the world’s salvation. She shows us the greatness to which we are called: a life free from sin and filled with God’s grace that leads to union with God in Heaven. She is the model disciple, and therefore worthy of imitation and veneration, not as an end in herself, but as the means to the very purpose of her – and our – existence: Christ himself.
God’s lowly handmaiden would not want it any other way.
"So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it"....."For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast." (Isaiah 55:11,Psalm 33:9)
You are preaching to the choir in that regard. It is for that very reason I have great trouble with "Queen of Heaven" sort of talk, for we see nothing much of the sort in Jewish thought, with it needing rely upon conflating "reigning with Christ" to make Mary "queen". I see very shaky theological ground there.
Along with what "communion with the saints" coming across as communicating with singular human persons who have previously died, passed on, themselves originally merely created beings, instead of praying to God the Father, in the name of Jesus, as we were explicitly INSTRUCTED, while also strongly hearkening back to ancient times, back as far as Gilgamesh, who when died & passed on himself, was elevated to status of "god/protector" one could appeal to with prayer.
Different city/states would have different "god/protectors", basically "saints" appealed to in the spirit realm. That developed into becoming polythesim --- and was the VERY ENVIRONMENT Abram was called out of in the first place!!!
Get it?
The Bathsheba story is a strain. I've seen it reasonably enough refuted elsewhere...
Remember. David was king all right, but still a man. A created being, not God. Hear oh Israel, our God is One! There will always remain delineation between ourselves and the Creator, even if or when we or others be hid, or united in Christ.
The church is the bride, Christ is the bridegroom. Members of the church make up the [spiritual] body of the bride. It's not --- here's the church (made of redeemed human souls) and then there's God with Mary sitting next to Jesus on a bench seat for the three of them, very much like Mary replacing the Holy Ghost!
One God. Not more. Not created spirits assuming or granted God-like, becoming a pantheon, a cacophony of pleadings, with special "graces" dispensed from individuals comprising the pantheon. For if they be united with Him, they will move much as One. He will know all things. We will know, even as we are known...THAT is more towards the true & proper holy meaning of "communion of the saints".
Souls, human souls, created in the image and likeness of God, can and will abide (we have faith) with Him there in His realm, yet not become gods, nor godlike themselves, individually flying around, appearing to lonely souls, saying such as;
For remember, the God of the Hebrews, the Ancient of Days, is a Jealous God. There is no other. There cannot be. Absolutely not. We absolutely must remain within the Jude-Christian construct, rightfully & singularly.
The OT biblical support for anything else, dissolves into nothingness.
David understood it like a Protestant:
Psalm 51:12The JOY! of it - NOT salvation itself.
Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation; and uphold me with thy free spirit.
Many are taught by their ‘church’ as to what the ‘word’ means.
Others are taught by GOD.
The first bunch add a LOT to the ‘letter’ of Acts chapter 15.
If this concept was so 'biblical' and evident; WHY did it take SO long for it to be finalized?
HMMmm...
I guess I can scratch off that hope of SLEEPING IN THE GRAVE until that trumpet sounds...
Not to a lot of RCC members.
If they AIN'T with us; they's agin us!
O...
K...
But SURELY John recorded her presence in Revelation chapters 4&5; right??
Are they not still HUMAN?
How do they then have the ABILITY to do this?
Millions of normal, earthly folks bombarding them with requests would require GOD-like powers.
HOW did they get them?
Not quite...
... a religion based on hatred of the ERRORS of the Holy Catholic Apostolic Church.
You HAVE to admit there were some; or else the COUNTER-reformation would not have taken place.
Your Mother and Brothers are here!
So?
Matthew 12:47-50
Produce the list of these LIES so I can see the evidence for myself.
“Mary; I want you to go to Ninevah...”
Well; isn't THAT interesting!!
Genesis 1:1-4
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light, and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light day, and the darkness he called night. And there was evening, and there was morningthe first day.
“Hey!”, says cousin Elizabeth; “What about ME???”
My son’s a doctor!
Mine’s a lawyer.
Big deal - mine is the Son of GOD!!!
SOMEbody sure got left what was WRITTEN!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.