Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholics, Protestants, and Immaculate Mary
The Catholic Thing ^ | December 8, 2012 | David G. Bonagura, Jr.

Posted on 12/08/2012 2:24:39 PM PST by NYer

Do Catholics worship Mary? This question is as old as the Protestant Reformation itself, and it rests, like other disputed doctrinal points, on a false premise that has been turned into a wedge: the veneration of Mary detracts from the worship of Christ.

This seeming opposition between Mary and Christ is symptomatic of the Protestant tendency, begun by Luther, to view the entirety of Christian life through a dialectical lens – a lens of conflict and division. With the Reformation the integrity of Christianity is broken and its formerly coherent elements are now set in opposition. The Gospel versus the Law. Faith versus Works. Scripture versus Tradition. Authority versus Individuality. Faith versus Reason. Christ versus Mary.

The Catholic tradition rightly sees the mutual complementarity of these elements of the faith, as they all contribute to our ultimate end – living with God now and in eternity. To choose any one of these is to choose them all.

By contrast, to assert that Catholics worship Mary along with or in place of Christ, or that praying to Mary somehow impedes Christ’s role as “the one mediator between God and men” (1 Tim 2:5) is to create a false dichotomy between the Word made flesh and the woman who gave the Word his flesh. No such opposition exists. The one Mediator entrusted his mediation to the will and womb of Mary. She does not impede his mediation – she helps to make it possible.

Within this context we see the ancillary role that the ancilla Domini plays in her divine Son’s mission. Mary’s is not a surrogate womb rented and then forgotten in God’s plan. She is physically connected to Christ and his life, and because of this she is even more deeply connected to him in the order of grace. She is, in fact, “full of grace,” as only one who is redeemed by Christ could be.

The feast of Mary’s Immaculate Conception celebrates the very first act of salvation by Christ in the world. Redemption is made possible for all by his precious blood shed on the cross. Yet Mary’s role in the Savior’s life and mission is so critical and so unique that God saw it necessary to wash her in the blood of the Lamb in advance, at the first moment of her conception.

Called (from the series Woman) ©2006 Bruce Herman
  [oil on wood, 65 x 48”; collection of Bjorn and Barbara Iwarsson] For more information visit http://bruceherman.com

This reality could not be more Biblical: the angel greets Mary as “full of grace” (Luke 1:28), which is literally rendered as “already graced” (kecharitōmenē). Following Mary, the Church has “pondered what sort of greeting this might be” for centuries. The dogma of the Immaculate Conception, ultimately defined in 1854, is nothing other than a rational expression of the angel’s greeting contained in Scripture: Mary is “already graced” with Christ’s redemption at the very moment of her creation.

Because God called Mary to the unique vocation of serving as the Mother of God, it is not just her soul that is graced, as is the case for us when we receive the sacraments. Mary’s entire being, body and soul, is full of grace so that she may be a worthy ark for the New Covenant. And just as the ark of the old covenant was adorned with gold to be a worthy house for God’s word, Mary is conceived without original sin to be the living and holy house for God’s Word.

Thus Mary is not only conceived immaculately, that is, without stain of sin. She also is the Immaculate Conception. Her entire being was specifically created by God with unique privilege so that she could fulfill her role in God’s plan of salvation. “Free from sin,” both original and personal, is the necessary consequence of being “full of grace.”

Protestants claim that veneration of Mary as it is practiced by Catholics is not biblical. St. Paul encouraged the Corinthians to “be imitators of me, as I am of Christ” (1 Cor 11:1). Paul is not holding himself up as the end goal, but as a means to Christ, the true end. And if a person is imitated, he is simultaneously venerated.

If we should imitate Paul, how much more should we imitate Mary, who fulfilled God’s will to the greatest degree a human being could. Throughout her life she humbled herself so that God could be exalted, and because of this, Christ has fulfilled his promise by exalting his lowly mother to the seat closest to him in God’s kingdom.

Mary is the model of humility, charity, and openness to the will of God. She allows a sword to pierce her heart for the sake of the world’s salvation. She shows us the greatness to which we are called: a life free from sin and filled with God’s grace that leads to union with God in Heaven. She is the model disciple, and therefore worthy of imitation and veneration, not as an end in herself, but as the means to the very purpose of her – and our – existence: Christ himself.

God’s lowly handmaiden would not want it any other way.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: mary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,881-2,9002,901-2,9202,921-2,940 ... 4,981-5,000 next last
To: annalex
Yes, that too, but again, the Inquisition was dealing with Catholics or those pretending to be Catholics , and WITCHES.

The 1578 handbook for inquisitors spelled out the purpose of inquisitorial penalties: ... quoniam punitio non refertur primo & per se in correctionem & bonum eius qui punitur, sed in bonum publicum ut alij terreantur, & a malis committendis avocentur.

Translation from the Latin: "... for punishment does not take place primarily and per se for the correction and good of the person punished, but for the public good in order that others may become terrified and weaned away from the evils they would commit."[6]

2,901 posted on 12/28/2012 7:28:30 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2892 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Otherwise known as a ‘teaching moment’.


2,902 posted on 12/28/2012 7:30:47 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2901 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

NOPE! None of dem neither. Ain’t skeered!


2,903 posted on 12/28/2012 7:39:22 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2822 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
"You should know that the Baptist church, unlike the Catholic church, is considered A CULT. I would never pass judgement against any Christians, but while you were busy passing judgement on the Christian denomination with the largest number of Christian members who choose Catholicism, others are spreading calumny against Baptists, the same way you do against Catholics. (I guarantee you the offenders are not Catholic).

http://www.millennialstar.org/southern-baptist-convention-is-a-cult/

It's not right, but you are also under attack. There are long lists of religious cults, and none of them are Catholic. Catholics are imperfect, but none of us are. Attack the Catholic church to your own detriment. It hurts all Christians, but it hurts you more. "You reap what you sow." Not only are other Protestant denominations calling Baptists a cult, so are former members.

http://www.thinkatheist.com/group/formersouthernbaptists

I think we all need to get our own houses in order, before we start throwing rocks. I'll pray for you.

Why are former Baptists calling Southern Baptists a cult?

http://lostcodex.com/2010/07/are-the-southern-baptists-a-cult/

I'm not going to say I agree, but whatever cult it was that told my aunt she couldn't associate with her loving Catholic family, was very critical of Catholics, family, and anyone who wasn't a cult member. Criticism and judgement of christians who haven't sinned against you, or hurt you directly, is NOT christian.

2,904 posted on 12/28/2012 8:11:50 PM PST by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2893 | View Replies]

To: narses

Baptism does not save anyone. No baby makes that personal choice to believe. Infant baptism is something done to the baby. It is not an outward profession of faith that that baby has already exercised.

Tell me the Catholic opinion.

Does baptism save anyone?

If it does, why don’t Catholics have assurance of that salvation?


2,905 posted on 12/28/2012 8:11:57 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2871 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
"You were TAUGHT what it means."

I have been educated, nor indoctrinated. catholic teaching is never contrary to reason.

Peace be with you.

2,906 posted on 12/28/2012 8:13:38 PM PST by Natural Law (Jesus did not leave us a Bible, He left us a Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2898 | View Replies]

To: mgist; bramps
We'll you should know that the Baptist church, unlike the Catholic church, is considered A CULT. I would never pass judgement against any Christians,

Oh really? And you just didn't with your first statement?

And you haven't against me?

2,907 posted on 12/28/2012 8:14:43 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2872 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Thank you.

Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. (Matthew 5:9)


2,908 posted on 12/28/2012 8:18:58 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2848 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Now that is an idiotic statement. So when Christ comes and your neighbor calls to say "He is in the town square talking to people" you response will be "Sorry, I am a true believer, I don't need to go anywhere?"

Matthew 24:23-26 23 Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you beforehand. 26 So, if they say to you, ‘Look, he is in the wilderness,’ do not go out. If they say, ‘Look, he is in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it.

Luke 17:20-24 20 Being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, he answered them, “The kingdom of God is not coming in ways that can be observed, 21 nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There!’ for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you.”

22 And he said to the disciples, “The days are coming when you will desire to see one of the days of the Son of Man, and you will not see it. 23 And they will say to you, ‘Look, there!’ or ‘Look, here!’ Do not go out or follow them. 24 For as the lightning flashes and lights up the sky from one side to the other, so will the Son of Man be in his day.

2,909 posted on 12/28/2012 8:22:24 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2880 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I referenced links where other Protestant groups, along with former Baptists, claim that southern Baptists are a cult. I also said that I can’t make that judgement, but certainly there are way too many religious cults out there. I didn’t accuse, or pretend to be an authority of Baptist teachings, simply stated what others say about Southern Baptists. That is only out of respect to my God, otherwise I would have choice words for you. Don’t post to me.


2,910 posted on 12/28/2012 8:26:14 PM PST by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2907 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Not sure why you sent me that. I’m not a member of the Baptist church. I couldn’t care less what “denomination”. If they teach counter to what scripture teaches I call them in error. Scripture doesn’t delineate between “denominations” or man made and constructed “religious” organizations. When the apostles saw error in any church they called them on it. Just because someone calls themselves a Christian or designates their organization a Christian organization doesn’t mean they conform to what scripture teaches. If they don’t and are in error I speak up like the apostles did and always will.


2,911 posted on 12/28/2012 8:26:28 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2904 | View Replies]

To: annalex; count-your-change
Yes, that too, but again, the Inquisition was dealing with Catholics or those pretending to be Catholics. It is an internal ecclesial court.

Well, yeah, of course there's a difference. That certainly justifies the use of torture then, doesn't it?

For the rest of us infidels, it's the Crusades all over again.

2,912 posted on 12/28/2012 8:26:42 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2892 | View Replies]

To: narses; metmom
I would hope all those on your ping list will go back and read Metmom’s posts to actually understand what she is saying by them. As is standard operating procedure for some here, snippet hunting is a very poor excuse for actual discussion. If the intent is to mock and ridicule someone because one doesn't believe the same way, that too will be apparent and I have more faith in the intelligence of “your” ping partners than you, it seems.
2,913 posted on 12/28/2012 8:33:28 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2862 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty

That’s a good prayer for all of us to remember here.


2,914 posted on 12/28/2012 8:34:38 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2855 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; Elsie
I have been educated, nor indoctrinated. catholic teaching is never contrary to reason.

Sure it is because it's contrary to Scripture.

It is unreasonable to teach something as truth that is clearly stated in Scripture.

Elsie has just been giving fine examples of that Scripture posts about the rock.

2,915 posted on 12/28/2012 8:37:44 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2906 | View Replies]

To: mgist
That is only out of respect to my God, otherwise I would have choice words for you.

I've been judged again, eh?

2,916 posted on 12/28/2012 8:42:10 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2910 | View Replies]

To: metmom
"Sure it is because it's contrary to Scripture."

Catholic teaching can never contrary to Scripture. Scripture proceeded from Catholic teaching.

Peace be to you

2,917 posted on 12/28/2012 8:46:35 PM PST by Natural Law (Jesus did not leave us a Bible, He left us a Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2915 | View Replies]

Comment #2,918 Removed by Moderator

To: annalex; metmom; Natural Law
The problem here is is that “omnipresence” is taught as an attribute of God, and angels are not gods. You are, of course, correct: there is no meaningful difference between “omnipresence” and “being where God sends them at once”.

No, the problem is in not understanding what the prefix "omni" means. When we're talking about omnipresence we are speaking about God being present in all places at all times. Just as omniscience means ALL knowing and omnipotence means ALL powerful. Angels can be sent to any place God sends them, but they are NOT omnipresent (in all places at all times). There is HUGE difference between them.

2,919 posted on 12/28/2012 9:06:53 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2883 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; ...
Yeah, but dontcha know?

They have ONE verse that they interpret as telling them otherwise. Which by the admission of their own CCC can have two meanings.

So they even recognize the validity of the *Protestant* interpretation.

Just for Catholics

http://www.justforcatholics.org/11.10.pdf

For instance St Augustine wrote: ‘For on this very account the Lord said, On this rock will I build my Church, because Peter had said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. On this rock, therefore, He said, which you have confessed, I will build my Church. For the Rock was Christ; and on this foundation was Peter himself also built. For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Christ Jesus’ (Augustine, Tractate 124, 5). So Augustine taught that the rock was Peter’s confession, that is, Christ himself.

Even more interesting is the plain admission by the modern Roman Catholic Church that the rock is Peter’s confession. ‘Moved by the grace of the Holy Spirit and drawn by the Father, we believe in Jesus and confess: ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ On the rock of this faith confessed by St Peter, Christ built his Church’ (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 424).

For those who need to hear it from the CCC themselves.....

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1D.HTM

424 Moved by the grace of the Holy Spirit and drawn by the Father, we believe in Jesus and confess: 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.'8 On the rock of this faith confessed by St. Peter, Christ built his Church.9 "To preach. . . the unsearchable riches of Christ"10

2,920 posted on 12/28/2012 9:08:09 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2898 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,881-2,9002,901-2,9202,921-2,940 ... 4,981-5,000 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson