Crossing the Jordan into the Inner Meaning [New Church, Open]

While i cannot concur that doctrinally they have more in common with Protestantism than Catholicism, yet if not submitting to Roman doctrines of papal infallibility (a cardinal issue), papal jurisdiction, purgatory, the Immaculate Conception and other things are such primary issue as they are made to be when evangelicals disagree, then to be consistent we should see like contenton btwn them.

Scripture says that if righteousness could be gained by the law, Christ died for nothing.

But the principle remains, that if righteousness could be gained by ANY other means, Christ died for nothing.

While i cannot concur that doctrinally they have more in common with Protestantism than Catholicism, yet if not submitting to Roman doctrines of papal infallibility (a cardinal issue), papal jurisdiction, purgatory, the Immaculate Conception and other things are such primary issue as they are made to be when evangelicals disagree, then to be consistent we should see like contenton btwn them.

My point exactly.

You put it better, as usual.

>But the principle remains, that if righteousness could be gained by ANY other means, Christ died for nothing.<

And (to preach to some of the choir) this applies to “salvation by grace thru merit,” in which grace is understood as a means of deserving salvation, in which one believes God will accept him/her into glory because they are overall good people (esp. as compared to their neighbors, who likewise think they are good as compared with them), and don’t really hurt anyone. They may expect some mercy will be given them, and have an ambiguous idea of Jesus death and resurrection having something to do with this, but essentially they see themselves as basically worthy of eternal life.

But while God rewards works which testify to true faith, or worthy faith (Mt. 25:34-40) - as “faith without works is dead,” (Ja. 2:17,20,26) while true faith “hath great recompense of reward,” (Heb. 10:34) - yet it is Abrahamic type faith that is counted for righteousness, justifying the UnGodly. (Rm. 4:4-6)

And those who trust that they find acceptance with God based upon their goodness have never come to the place where they were convicted of their need for salvation as souls damned because of their works, not saved because of them, and + destitute of any righteousness whereby they may escape their eternal punishment in Hell-fire and gain eternal life with an infinitely holy God, which is a gift by faith in the Divine Son of God who is righteous, in whom justice and mercy are manifested.

“Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. “ (Romans 3:25-26)

"Try again, if you dare."

I'm sure it is somewhat galling to learn that when you scratch the surface and take away all of that Swiss wrapping paper you essentially believe in the Catholic concept of purgation (Purgatory), but Jean Calvin did began as a Catholic. You simply differ in what you believe happens within the mystery.

Peace be with you

You know, in the Lord's Second Coming, don't you think He would want to straighten just a few things out in His kingdom on earth? Nunc Licet. Now it is permitted to understand.

Besides this list, Franklin subscribed to True Christianity, Johnny Appleseed (John Chapman) was a Swedenborgian missionary, Lincoln read his work, Lois Wilson was brought up in the Church and the list goes on. All these are guilty of being part of a (Satanic) cult? LOL Okie dokie, then...

...Lincoln read his work...

Huh?

I've 'read' Joseph Smith's 'work'. Does that mean I agree with it?

Posted a few years ago at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2344981/posts

'The better angels of our nature' is definitely a New Church concept.

“You know, in the Lord’s Second Coming, don’t you think He would want to straighten just a few things out in His kingdom on earth?”

If you read the Bible, you will find out that the first thing Christ does when He returns is to slay his enemies who are gathered against Him. Clearly, you won’t have “straightened out” things.

“Besides this list, Franklin subscribed to True Christianity, Johnny Appleseed (John Chapman) was a Swedenborgian missionary, Lincoln read his work, Lois Wilson was brought up in the Church and the list goes on. All these are guilty of being part of a (Satanic) cult? LOL Okie dokie, then...”

Clearly, they were wrong, if they bought into the false doctrines of Swedenborgianism. But that’s all you got - a list of names. Frankly, a cultic practice to promote credibility.

If non-Catholics are honest about applying their professed "Hebrew origin" rationale they should also throw out Danial.

Again, since this is a misunderstanding on your part, it is that argument that is thrown out. "

No, it's actually misleading on your part since I was obviously mention Danial to show that relying on "Hebrew origin" is a lame concept. That was obvious to anyone who can read and who isn't trying very hard to mischaracterize what I said.

Seeing a post start with deliberate misdirecting and mischaracterization more often than not means that whatever links such a post contains are worthless work by some lame dolt the poster tries to help by trying to generate page hits for them so I didn't bother with the links, either. It's always interesting when someone in the religion forum uses the misdirection tactics as the liberal scum. It makes you wonder if they have the same home office guiding them.

I didn't get beyond that initial mischaracterization of my post. I figure the rest was intended to distort rather than discuss just like the opening misdirection.

You seem to be quite the expert! 'aMorePerfectUnion cult site:freerepublic.com' on Google is something!

What is your church's website again?

A valid point which exposes an invalid argument.

Purgatory has extensively dealt with here, as in this thread and arguments for it refuted, and which may be basically seen here, here, while the purgatory of Rome is even rejected by the Orthodox on the same primary basis that Rome primarily supports it by, that of Tradition:

The Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America states: “The Orthodox Church does not believe in purgatory (a place of purging), that is, the inter-mediate state after death in which the souls of the saved (those who have not received temporal punishment for their sins) are purified of all taint preparatory to entering into Heaven, where every soul is perfect and fit to see God...The Church lived for fifteen hundred years without such a theory.” (www.goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7076)

“The Orthodox Church opposes the Roman doctrines of universal papal jurisdiction, papal infallibility, purgatory, and the Immaculate Conception precisely because they are untraditional.” (THE WAY: What Every Protestant Should Know About the Orthodox Church, Clark Carlton, 1997, p 135)

Of course, there are other issues with both which we must differ with based on Scripture.

"Somewhere, DMS is smiling; knowing that yet another thread of his making has descended into the non-heretics fussing with each other."

You got that right.

I should have known better than to bring it up just because the books I've read on explaining why things were removed don't make much sense when applied to all seven books. I could see the arguments a bit for dropping two and maybe three of them, but not all seven and especially not when they were retained with the proviso they were good for everything except basing doctrine on.

What I learned is that "Christian Liberty" applies to both contraceptives and the canon so I look forward to the various soon to be published subsets of the Bible.

This really isn't the religion forum as much as it's a good place to showcase just why Christians in this country are a pushover for the anti-Christ crowd.

Regards

Dave,
You can call names all you want. It is a fact that Swedenborgianism promotes heretical doctrine, condemned by the Christian Church.

As to me, I don’t care what name you apply. It is God’s opinion I care about, as revealed in the Holy Scriptures.

Here’s how He describes my church...

The Church of the Firstborn
The Body of Christ
The Church that the doors of Hell won’t prevail against
The family of God
The Household of God
A holy nation
A people for God’s own possession
An Everlasting Kingdom
A royal priesthood

It was formed by Christ on the foundation of His Apostles
It preserved the New Testament books and letters
It fought the heresies that attacked it continually
It will triumph and rule with Christ, as well as share His glory.

The great news is that you can leave the cultic heresy of Swedenborgianism and become a member of Christ’s Church. The price has already been paid for your sins.

Kindest Regards,
AMPU

No, it's actually misleading on your part since I was obviously mention Danial to show that relying on "Hebrew origin" is a lame concept. That was obvious to anyone who can read and who isn't trying very hard to mischaracterize what I said.

What part of "This sentence refers to the Hebrew canon" is so hard for you to comprehend? (Post 207.) Your polemic was based on the premise that being written in Hebrew was the criteria for canonical inclusion by us, rather than on whether it was in the Hebrew canon.

If you were familiar with and understood the arguments against the apocrypha, which you have thus far evidenced you are not but seem to be parroting one sided RC apologetics, then you would know that being written in another language does not necessarily negate Hebrew origin, nor does being in Hebrew necessarily mean it is canonical. Nor does inclusion in the LXX, despite your refuted recourse to that.

Seeing a post start with deliberate misdirecting and mischaracterization...

I think you are confused. I did not do any misdirecting, but referred you to the source of the statement in clarifying what was meant by "the Hebrew," having read that page myself prior to this, while it was you whose argument was based on mischaracterization of what that meant, even if it was not deliberate on your part.

more often than not means...

is this allegation the result of a scientific study or an opinion needed to justify your excuse?

that whatever links such a post contains are worthless work by some lame dolt the poster tries to help by trying to generate page hits for them so I didn't bother with the links

Well that is not only unsubstantiated but is a typical excuse given by other RCs for not looking at the evidence that refutes them. Rather than trying to generate page hits being the real reason for posting links (one of which was to the Catholic Encyclopedia, and i do not even know if i can find out how may page hits such pages as http://peacebyjesus.tripod.com/ancients_on_scripture.html#2 get), i provide them as they supply needed or supplementary substantiation and which would often make the post quite long to reproduce here, and often they are to my own work and compilation.

However, unlike some of your RC comrades, links are rarely supplied as a substitute for an argument of my own.

It's always interesting when someone in the religion forum uses the misdirection tactics as the liberal scum. It makes you wonder if they have the same home office guiding them.

You are beginning to sound desperate and an irrational conspiratorialist, like some of those you call "scum," but such were some of us, for whom Christ died.

I didn't get beyond that initial mischaracterization of my post. I figure the rest was intended to distort rather than discuss just like the opening misdirection.

Again, the mischaracterization was your post, as a result of your lack of understanding of what "the Hebrew" referred to and your polemic was based upon, and which my post response corrected. And thus so far all your arguments have been shown to be specious.

You know, in the Lord's Second Coming, don't you think He would want to straighten just a few things out in His kingdom on earth? Nunc Licet. Now it is permitted to understand.

And the borg taught that Second Coming of the Lord would not take place in person, but in the Word. You forgot to say the borg emphasized that the Lord’s return would be spiritual not physical. (No. 776 of the True Christian Religion)

And you list shows that smart people can be fooled - so your point is?

Yes, but with a caveat. Our own hardheartedness, or lack of forgiveness towards others, can severely limit if not cut us off entirely from true communion with Him.

Of course. When we give in to our sinful nature - which is "legally" dead while spiritually still kicking in this mortal body - and sin against God, we jeopardize our fellowship relationship with Him and which only confession and repentance forgives and cleanses us from all unrighteousness, reopening the lines of communication and fellowship. Though our mortal man is perishing (in the process of dying) our new man is renewed, growing in grace and in the knowledge of Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior.

Our place of cleansing is the cross and not some place or state in the middle between life on earth and our home in Heaven. The debt of our sin was paid in full on the cross and, when we leave this earthly life, those of us who have received the gift of eternal life by grace through faith will not have any sin - nor the "temporal" debt it racked up - with which to pay through our own suffering or contributions. While we still are here in the flesh, our actions determine the depth of fellowship we have with our redeemer, but once we die, our actions no longer CAN affect it as we are now with the Lord rid of the encumbrances of the flesh and its old-nature hold.

bttt

""that being written in another language does not necessarily negate Hebrew origin, nor does being in Hebrew necessarily mean it is canonical. Nor does inclusion in the LXX""

Thanks for admitting this. There is no clear cut Hebrew canon that is reliable either other than scraps and pieces AS IS FOR MANY NON HEBREW AS WELL.

The reality is that we rely on the Early Church Fathers and the Catholic/ Orthodox Church and believe they were guided by the Holy Spirit to tell us what Scripture is Inspired

Just take a look at the following courtesy of UPENN and imagine trying to figure out from many little pieces in many cases as to what is authentic,let alone trying to make sense of what the missing pieces must have said

LISTING BY WHAT CAME TO BE CANONICAL ORDER

text	details	date	IDs, further information
??	JEA 11(1925) 241-46 (Gk-Copt extracts)	3/4ce
"OT"	Rome Bibl Vat 1209 Codex Vaticanus (colophons)	4+ce	[#B]
"OT"	London BM Codex Sinaiticus (sectioning, rubification) (colophon comparison with Vaticanus)	4+ce	[#S]
Octateuch	Leiden, Paris, etc. Codex ?	4/5ce	[#G]
Gen 1-35	PBerlin fol 66 I/II (paragr, KS) [t 3/4ce]	3+ce	[#911] vh004 t001
Gen 1.1-5 LXX & A'	PAmherst 1.3 (excerpts?) (QS; with Hebs; pl)	4-ce	[#912=U2] vh003 (early 4th) t001B (3/4ce)
Gen 2-3	POxy 1007 [pl] = PLitLond. 1991 (parchm; ZZ tetragr, QS)	3+ce	[#907] vh005 t002 LDAB 3113
Gen 3-38	PFouad 266a (roll)(sp, blanks) [Zaki Aly - L. Koenen, Three rolls of the Early Septuagint, 1980]	1bce	[#942] vh056a LDAB 3450 AlandAT3 [K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.91 no.5a]
Gen 5-6	POxy 1073 = PLitLond 200 (Latin parchment; 2 cols?; plate)	4ce	[Latin] t003
Gen 9-15, 17-44	PChBeat 4 (blanks, paragr, KS)	4ce	[#961] vh008 t005
Gen 13.3-9	BKT 8.2 = PBerlin 16353 (parchment)	4/5ce	[#959] vh010 t006A
Gen 13.6-8, 10	PMich inv 2724 (= 131) (parchment; QS)	4ce	[#832] vh011
Gen 14 (quote?)	PLitLond 228 = BrMus 212	3ce	[# = U3]
Gen 14	PYale 1\r and \v (sp, mid dots, abbrev number) [ed=vh 1+ce; t2/3ce]	2ce	[#814] vh012 t007 LDAB 3081
Gen 14-27	POxy 656 (sp, blanks, dots, blank tetra)	2/3ce	[#905=U4] vh013 t009 LDAB 3094
Gen 16	POxy 1166 (roll)(space/punct, KS; Jewish?) [restored col]	3ce	[#944] vh014 t010
Gen 19	PBerlin 17213 (space/punct, cf tetragr [Treu plate])	3-ce	[#995] vh015 t011A
Gen 24-46	PChBeat 5 (sp,paragr, ekthesis, KS)	3+ce	[#962] vh007 t011 [3/4ce]
Gen 26/Dt 28	POsl 2.11 + PRyl 460 (Testimonies)	4-ce	[#958] vh299
Gen 27-28	PBerlin Eg 9778 (parchm)	3/4ce	[#903] vh017
Gen 27-28	St.Catherine's (Charlesworth ASOR 1981)	4ce	[#???]
Gen 31	POxy 1167 (QS)	4ce	[#945] vh021 t015
Gen 34.21-22 and 25	Cairo, Egyptian Museum SR 3805 (9) [pl p.194] (parchment, 2 col) [Archiv 43 (1997), p.108]	4ce	[#???] LDAB 3157 [A. Hanafi, in G.Pugliese-Caratelli e.a. (edd.), Roma e l'Egitto nell'Antichita Classica (1992), p.191-196]
Gen 36	PBerlin 17035 [ed Treu] (parchment; Symmachus?)	5/6ce	[#831] vh022
Gen 37-38	PMunch 610 [103] (parchm 2col)	4ce	[#935] vh024 t017
Gen 37.3-4 and 9	Geneva, Bibl. Publ. et Univ., 99 [side 1] [side 2] (parchment, 2col; punct, ekthesis, UIWN) [J. Nicole, Rev. Phil. 28 (1904), p. 65-68; identified by A.Rahlfs, Nachr. Akad. Go%ttingen 1911, pp.263-266] (Samaritan?)	5/6ce	[Wevers unnumbered] vh023 LDAB 3270
Gen 38.23	StudPal 9.2 = PVindobG 39769 (parch, 2 col?)	4/5ce	[#949] vh025 t018
Gen 41	PHambIbscher 5 (parch)(sp/punct [rare])	4ce	[#997] vh028 t020
Gen 41	PErlangen 1 (inv 2) (sp/punct. QS)	4/5ce	[#996 (not in Wevers)] vh027 t019A
Gen 46-47	PLitLond 202 = BM P 2557 (sp/punct, Jewish?)	3/4ce	[#953] vh030 t022
Ex 4	PCollHorsley (Deissman Nachlass)(KS)	2/3ce	[HorsleyArchPapyrusf 30 (1993) 35ff [Hamilton]]
Ex 4-7	Schoyen 187 (blanks, paragr, QS)	4ce	[#866]
Ex 5-7	PBerlin 11766 + 14046 (parch; sp/punct, KS [Treu pl])	4ce	[#??? ] vh032 t023A
Ex 8/Dt 29	PBaden 56b = PHeid Gr 8 (sp at 8.11, KS)	2+ce	[#970] vh033 t024
Ex 9-10	PBodl gr bibl f 4 [3-6 ce] (parch) (sp/punct, KS)	3/4ce	[Spottorno-Marcos Emerita 44 (1976) 385ff (Hamilton, Tov)]
Ex 20.10-22	POxy 4442\r and \v (blanks, dicolon, QS) [pl 2-3] [D.Colomo, Atti del XXII Congresso di Papirologia (Firenze 1998), Firenze 2001, pp.269-277]	3-ce	[#???] LDAB 3118 [Hamilton, Tov]
Ex 22-23	PHarris 2 166 (1985) (blanks, paragr)	3ce	[#???] LDAB 3104
Ex 28	7QLXXEx (roll) [check dating; LDAB 000 (confused?)]	2/1bce	[#805] vh038 LDAB 3456 AlandAT18
Ex 29	PMilan Vogliano 1.22 RUniv (parch)	4ce	[#972] vh039 t028B
Ex 31f	POxy 1074 (plate recto) [ed 2/3ce]	3-ce	[#908] vh040 t029
Ex 34.18-20	PBerlin 16990 = BKT 8.24 [Teru, pl] (parchment)[Schubart 5/6ce!](see Ex 5 MS?)	4ce?	[#978] vh041 t029A
Ex 34-35	PBerlin 14039 (parch; sp/punct, KS [Treu])	3/4ce	[#???] vh042 t029B
Ex 40	PRein 2.59 = PSorbonne 2166 =PReinach 2.59	3ce	[#1000] vh043 t031
Ex 40	POxy 1075 (roll, space/punct, KS)	3ce	[#909] vh044
Lev 2-5	4QLXXLev\b Jerusalem, Rockefeller Museum (roll)(sp, blanks, paragr, IAW)	1bce	[#802] vh046 LDAB 3452 AlandAT22
Lev 10	PSchoyen 2649 (sp) (Hamilton)	2+ce	[#???]
Lev 16.33f	POxy 1225 [pl 5] = Princeton, Theological Seminary 12 (roll)(sp/punct)	4-ce	[#947] vh048 t033 LDAB 3185 AlandAT23
Lev 19.16-19, 31-33	PHeid 290 ([K]S QS)[pl 1 in PHeid 4; K. Treu, Archiv 34 (1988), p.69 no.48a]	3ce	[#858] LDAB 3112
Lev 22.3	Frags from Sinai 15 (parch)	4ce	[#931] t034
Lev 26	4QLXXLev\a ("leather" roll)(blanks) [check dating; LDAB 000]	2/1bce	[#801] vh049 LDAB 3454
Lev 27	POxy 1351 (parch, 2col; blank)	4ce	[#954] vh050 t035
Nm - Dt	PChBeat 6 (2col; sp sects, para?, KS)[edd 2ce]	2/3ce	[#963] vh052 t036
Nm 3-4	4QLXXNu ("leather" roll)(sp)	000	[#803] vh051 t036A LDAB 3455
Nm 6	Marble plaque Thess (Samaritan; Heb/Gk; Tov)	4ce	[Wevers, no number] vh053
Deut, Jsh	Washingtonensis (parchment 2col) [t 6ce]	5/6ce	[#W] t037
Dt 1-6	Chester Beatty Libr., P. Chester Beatty VI [Edition: F.G.Kenyon, The Chester Beatty Biblical Papyri, Fasc甃AGreek?甃AEnglish?V. London 1935 (Facsimile-Edition Dublin 1958). Cf. also A.Pietersma, Vetus Testamentum 24(1974), 113-118]	2 ce	[#963]
Dt 2-3	PRyl 1 (reused doc dated 293)(sp/punct, KS; 2col?)	4ce	[#920] vh055 t038
Dt 10-33	PFouad 266c (roll)(sp) [Zaki Aly - L. Koenen, Three rolls of the Early Septuagint, 1980]	1+bce	[#847] vh056c LDAB 3453 Aland01; [K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.91 no.55a]
Dt 11.4	4QLXXDeut = 4Q122 ("leather" roll) [E. Ulrich, Studies J.W. Wevers (1984), p.71-82 = Disc. Jud. Desert 09 122]	2bce	[#819] LDAB 3458 [K. Treu, Archiv 31 (1985), p.59 no.55b]
Dt 17-33	PFouad 266b (roll)(sp, blanks, paragr, Heb tetragr, stichometric in 32) [Zaki Aly - L. Koenen, Three rolls of the Early Septuagint, 1980]	1bce	[#848] vh056b t037A LDAB 3451 Aland01 = AT27 [K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.91]
Dt 23-28	PRyl 458 (roll)(sp, high dot) [C.H.Roberts, Bull. J.Rylands Library 20 (1936), pp.219-245]	2bce	[#957] vh057 t039 LDAB 3459
Deut 24-29	PGiessen 13+19+22+26 [side 1] [side 2] (parchment 2col, now lost or illegible) (sp/punct, KS QS, possibly Samaritan?) [P. Glaue - A. Rahlfs, Nachr. Akad. Göttingen, (1911), p. 167-200 = Mitteilungen 1, 2, p. 31-64; E. Tov, Rev. Bibl. 78 (1971), p.355-383]	5/6ce	[Wevers: collated without Rahlfs number] vh058 t040 LDAB 3273
Dt 28.8 & 11	Manchester, John Rylands Libr., P.Gr.460 [ Edition: C.H.Roberts, Two Biblical Papyri in the John Rylands Library Manchester, Manchester 1936; Fragment of a leaf of a Florilegium or Testimonium. O.Osloessnsis II No.11 is on the same leaf.	early 4th ce	[#958]
Dt 29	Heidelberg, Univ. Bibl., Inv. Pap. Graec. No.8 [ Edition: Fr. Bilabel, Griechische Papyri (Urkunden, Briefe, Schreibtafeln, Ostraka etc..) with 2 tables. Ver鰂fent璴ichungen aus den badischen Papyrus-Sammlungen. Heft 4. Heidelberg 1924, 24-27.	2 ce	[#970]

Jsh 4-5	POxy 1168 (parch; sp/punct, KS)	4ce	[#946] vh061 t042
Josh 9-11	PSchoyen 2648 (sp, blanks, KS & nom sac, page numbers)	2/3ce	[DeTroyer via Hamilton]
Jdg 1	PSI 2.127 (ed 5ce, t 3-ce)	3ce	[#968] vh062 t043
Jdg 20.22	Mt. Sinai fragment p.2 (parchment)	4ce	[#???] t046
1Sm 18.8-25	PWien 187 (parch; pl)	4ce	[#???] vh065 t047
1Sm 22-24	PFeinberg 1 [t 5ce?]	4/5ce	[# ???] vh066 t049
1Sm 24 - 2Sm 1	PYale 2183, Beinecke 544 (parchment; sp/punct, paragr, KS)	4/5ce	[#???] vh067 t047A
2Sm 15-16	PStrasb 911 + 1027-1028	4/5ce	[#???] vh068 t048
1Kgs 21, 2Kgs 23	Codex Cambridge 12.184 + 20.50 = Taylor-Schlechter 2.89.326 (Aquila) (parchment palimpsest [Heb liturgical text over, 11ce]; sp/punct, paleo-Heb tetragr)	5/6ce	[#?] vh074 t050 LDAB 3268
1Chr 25, 2Chr 4	Sinai, Monastery St. Catharina, New Collection 1, 1B1, 1A1 (reused as book binding) [P.Nicolopoulos, Ta nea euremata tou Sina, 1998, p.86 no.1 with pl.45] [C. Römer, Archiv 43 (1997), p.109]	4ce	LDAB 3190 [ D. Digbassanis, Proceedings 18th Congress of Papyrology, Athens (1988), p.75-79; photos]
2Chr 24	PLondChrist 3 = PEgerton 4 (parch, space/punct; KS)	3ce	[#971] vh075 t051A
2Chr 29-30	PBarc 3 (pl) [ed 2ce, t 3ce)	2/3ce	[#?] vh076 t051
Esth 4	PLitPalauRibes inv 163 (Barcelona) [pl 5] (palimpsest, newer script Arabic) [K. Treu, Archiv 32 (1986), p.97 no.77a]	3/4ce	LDAB 3128 [S. Daris, Aegyptus 66 (1986), pp. 106-107 = P.Lit. Palau Rib. 4] (Hamilton)
Esth 8-9	POxy 4443 (roll, sections, ekthesis, [Hamilton]) [full size column]	1/2ce	[#??] LDAB 3080

Ps ??	Milano, Università Statale degli Studi di Milano, T.Mil. Vogl. inv.5 (wood sheet, school text?)	4ce	LDAB 3172 [cf. S.Bucking, Akten 21 Kongr. Berlin 1997, p.136]
Ps 1	PSI 1989 = Firenze, Istituto Papirologico 'Girolamo Vitelli' 1989 (not codex; "Christian")	2+ce	[D. Limongi, P.Omagggio XX congr. (1992), no.1] LDAB 3085 (Hamilton)
Ps 1	PLaur 140 [Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana II/34] (roll? school text?) (KS, stich, "syllabification") [Cribiore 295; K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.92 no.85a]	3/4ce	LDAB 3136 [R. Pintaudi, ZPE 38 (1980), p.259-260 = P.Laur. 04 140] (Hamilton)
Ps 1	PTaur 27) (pl, chi-rho)	4ce	[#2116] vh084
Ps 1	POxy 1779 (sp/punct, KS, non-stich)	4ce	[#2073] vh090 t058
Ps 1-4	PChBeat 15 (with Phileas of Thmouis, apology) [K. Aland, Repertorium I 0207 + II, KV83; K. Treu, Archiv 32 (1986), p.91 no.710a]	4-ce	LDAB 3530 [A.Pietersma, P.Chester Beatty 15, Cahiers d'Orientalisme 1984] (Hamilton)
Ps 2	PLitLond 204 (KS, non-stich)(t 3ce?)	3ce	[#2051] vh092 t060
Ps 3-67	PVindob/Wien 9907-9972 (Gk-Sah, pl)	4ce	[#1220] vh096
Pss 7-8	POxy 1226 (KS, stichs)(t 3-ce)	3ce	[#2025] vh099 t065
Ps 8.2-9 [\|], 9.7-17[--]	PMich inv 22 [or 3.133] (blanks between stich) [or 4ce]	3ce	[#2067] vh101 t065A
Ps 9	PWien Rain 28 = PVindob 39786 (sp, marks, KS)[back blank; amulet?]	4-ce	[#2086?] vh105?(5th c) t068?
Pss 10-34	PLitLond 205 = BrMus pap 37	4/5ce?	[#U] vh108
Ps 11-13	PRainer 4.6 (parch, stich)	4ce	[#2087] vh110
Ps 11-14	PLitLond 207 (roll, then reused)(KS, stichs music?)	3/4ce	[#2019] vh109 t072 [Pack 1245]
Ps 14	PBarc inv 2 = Montserrat, Abadia de Montserrat II/2, (formerly Fundacion San Lucas Evangelista 2) [see K. Treu, Archiv 34 (1988), p.70 no.112a]	2-ce	([Hamilton])[Roca-Puig 1985] Proc. XVIIIth Congr. Athens, I, p.363 LDAB 3082
Ps 14	White Marble	4ce	[#2012] vh111
Ps 15-16	Monchen Gr. 333 = Mu%nchen Gr. 333 (reused roll, now a codex) [K. Treu, Archiv 35 (1989), p.107 no.112b]	4/5ce	LDAB 3207
Ps 17-18	BKT 8.5 = PBerlin 11682 (roll? liturg)	4ce	[#2059] vh117 t075B
Ps 17-118	PBodmer 24 (sp, punct, paragr, KS)(t 3/4ce)	3+ce	[#2110] vh118 t075a
Ps 18	PVindob/Wien = StudPal 9.6	4ce	[#2037] vh120 t077
Ps 19	PRyl add 3.1 (liturgical?)	3/4ce	[#] vh121
Ps 21	Cambridge Univ, Taylor-Schechter 12.182 (parchment palimpsest underwriting; Hexapla cols 2-5 [trimmed bifold: side one, inside fold]; PIPI tetragram)	7ce	[#2005] vh123 t078
Ps 21-23	PUG(enova) 1 (sp/punct, paragraphos, KS; pl)	3/4ce	[#] vh125
Ps 28	Freiburg, Universitätsbibliothek H4 (wood; practice letters?) [Brashear-Hoogendijk, Enchoria 17 (1990), p.46 n.30]	4/5/6ce	LDAB 3219 [Kosack, Alltag im Alten Aegypten, p.47]
Ps 28-29	PBerlin 5875 = BKT 8.7 (stich)	4ce	[#2045] vh131 t082
Ps 30	PBonnColl P147v (stichometric)	3/4ce	[Tov(Hamilton)][Shelton ZPE 25 (1977) 159ff pl]
Ps 30-55	PLeipzig 39 (reused roll, after 338ce)(paragr, KS, stich, ##on Pss)	4ce	[#2013] vh133 t083
Pss 31,26,2	PChesterBeat 14 (sp/punct, KS)	4ce	[Tov]
Ps 32	PRanier 4.24 = PVindob gr 29274 (sp/punct, KS; plus school exercises, Coptic; partly paginated, xi-rho)	4/5ce	[#2090] vh136 t085
Ps 33-34	PBodmer 9 (pl, with Apol Phileas) [t 4ce?]	4ce	[#2113] vh138 t087A
Ps 34 (excerpt?)	PVindob/Wien 26205+26607 = PRanier 4.9 (recto only; sp/punct, KS, stich?)	4ce	[#2091] vh141 t089
Ps 35-36	PBerlin 6747 + 6785 = BKT 8.8	4ce	[#2046] vh142 t090
Ps 36	PFlor = PSI 14.1371 (KS, stich)	4ce	[#2064] vh143 t091
Ps 39-41	PBour 2 = PSorbonne 827 (corrs)	4ce	[#2050] vh145 t093
Ps 43	PHarris 31 = Birmingham, Selly Oak College Libr.1821 [G.D. Kilpatrick, Journ. Theol. Stud. 50 (1949), p.176-177] (roll or sheet, amulet?) [t 4ce]	3/4ce	[#2108] vh148 t095A LDAB 3198 AlandAT67
Ps 48-49	PBodl 5 = Proc Br Acad 43 (1964), 229 (pl)(stich, no abbrevs; notes) [t 2/3ce]	2+ce	[#2082] vh151 t097A?
Ps 50	PLaur 03 54 [= Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana II/39] (pl 51 and on CD-ROM; R.Pintaudi) [K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.92 no.152a]	4-ce	LDAB 3164 (Hamilton)
Ps 67-68	PVindob/Wien 26035B = Rainer 4.12 (QS, stich; notes)	3ce	[#2094] vh165 t110
Ps 68-70	POxy 845 (stichometric)	4/5ce	[#2042] vh168 t112
Ps 68, 80	PVindob 39777 = StudPal 11.114 = PWien Rainer 18 (parch roll; Symmachus?) (paleo-Heb tetragr, QS) [C. Wessely, Me/langes Chatelain, p.224-229] [t 4ce and 3/4ce (listed twice)]	3/4ce	[#xx] vh167 t111B,113 LDAB 3492
Pss 72-89	PVindob G 39775a-b = StudPal 9.9-10	4/5ce	[#2039] vh171 t115
Ps 72-78	PChesterBeat 13 (sp/punct, KS)	4ce	[Tov]
[Ps 73 + 111]	PBiblUnivGiss 4.34 (roll)[see below, Ps 111]	4ce	[#see below] t116A,127
Ps 77	PVindob gr 35781 = Wien, Papyrussammlung Nationalbibliothek, G. 35781 (stich) [K.Treu, Archiv 26 (1978), p.153 no.175a]	4ce	LDAB 3194 [K.Treu, Jahrb. Osterr. Byz. Gesellsch. 23 (1974), p.4-6]
Ps 77	PAlex 240 = PSI 921 (QS, stich)	3ce
Ps 77	PSI 8.921 (recto = dated 143/44 ce)	2/3ce	[#2054] vh174 t117
Ps 79	PBerlin 8630 = PRhodos (lead roll, magical; dated 1-4 !!)	3ce	[#2004] vh177
Ps 81-82	PAntinop 7 (KS, non-stich[?]) [t 2/3ce]	2+ce	[#2077] vh179 t120
Ps 82-83	POxy 1352 (parch; sp/punct, KS, corrs, numbers)	3/4ce	[#2049] vh180 t121
Ps 83-84	POxy 2386 (roll, then reused for a letter?) (sp, marks, KS, stich)	4/5ce	[#2070] vh181 t122
Ps 88.4-8, 15-18	PDuke inv 740 (punct marking stichoi, sections, KS QS)	4-ce	LDAB 3162 [N.Gonis, Archiv 46 (2000), pp.14-15, pl 1 + 3] (Hamilton)
Ps 90-103	Cambridge, University Library Taylor-Schechter Collection 12.186 + AS.78.412; 12.187; 12.188 [pl] (parchment palimpsest [Heb over]; tetragram) [C. Taylor, Hebrew Greek Cairo Genizah Palimpsests, (1900), p. 51-85; description : descr. : N. Tchernetska, Pap. Flor. 031 (2000), p.737]	5/6ce	[#2006] vh203 LDAB 3469
Ps 92	PParis Louvre (lead tablets)	4-ce	vh205
Ps 101	PHarris frags from Mt.Sinai p.4 (parch)	4ce	t138
Ps 103-105	PBerlin 16390 = BKT 8.22 (parch)[t 4/5ce]	4ce	[#2060] vh214 t140A=146A
Ps 111 + 73	PGiss 4.34 (roll, liturg or amulet?)	4ce	[#2056] vh220 t127,116A
Ps 117.26-27	Wien, Private collection Fackelmann 10 = PRainer Cent. pl.47 (parchment from book binding, not a codex; amulet?) [Treu, Archiv 31 (1985), p.60 no. 222b]	4ce	LDAB 3191 [K. Niederwimmer, P.Rainer Cent. 25]
Ps 117-118	Ostrakon Kortenbeutel Gk-Copt (limestone)	4ce	[#2107] vh222 t149
Ps 118	PLeipzig 170 (KS, stich)[t 3ce; CHR 2ce]	2/3ce	[#2014] vh224 t151
Ps 118.22-40	Wien, Private collection Fackelmann 11 = PRainer Cent 26, pl.48 (parchment from book-binding) [Treu, Archiv 31 (1985), p.60 no. 223a]	4/5ce	LDAB 3213 [K. Niederwimmer, P.Rainer Cent. 26]
Ps 120 (119)	PBarc inv 10 (parchment) [R. Roca-Puig, Estrena de Nadal. Salm 119 (120), 7, segons la versio dels Setanta. Pergami de Barcelona, Inv. n° 10, Barcelona 1975]	3+ce	LDAB 9893 (Hamilton) [Roca Puig; Treu AFP 26 (1978) 153]
Ps 141	Leningrad cod gr 4 (parch)	4/5ce	t160
Ps 143-144	Cambridge, University Library Taylor-Schechter Collection 16.320 (parchment, palimps [Heb over]; Heb tetragramm) [J.H.A. Hart, Journ. Theol. Stud. 4 (1903), p. 215-17]	6ce	[#2006] vh236 LDAB 3314
Ps 143-148	PFlor = PSI 8.980 (lines between, KS)[ed 3ce]	3/4ce	[#2055] vh238 t162
Pss 144-145	PBerol inv 21265 (KS, stich) [BKT 9, pl.72]	3-ce	(Hamilton) [Ioannidou; Gronewalf ZPE 115 (1997) 130] LDAB 3102
Ps 146 (lead tablet)	PParis Louvre MND 552 H-L (sp, marks, KS)	4-ce	vh239
Ps 150	PColumbia 11 294 (T.Teeter) = New York, Columbia 97 (prayer on other side with KS) [P.Mirecki, BASP 38 (2001), pp.138-139]	4ce	LDAB 3476
Ode 8 (Dan 3)	Madrid, Fundación Pastor, P.Matr. bibl. 2 [Stud. Pal. 18] (not codex) [K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.93 no.247b]	4/5ce	LDAB 3205 [J. O'Callaghan, Stud. Pap. 18 (1979), p.13-16]

Job 1-2	PFlor = PSI 10.1163 (KS)[pl] [t or 3/4ce?]	4ce	[#955] vh272 t177
Job 9	PChBeat 18 (Hamilton) [Pietersma]	3ce
Job 33-34 (magic?)	PBerlin 11778 = BKT 8.17 (sp, blanks, dots, KS) [t 3ce, "not a codex"]	3-ce	[#974] vh275 t178A
Job 42	POxy 3522 (roll, paleo tetragr, sp)	1ce	[#??] LDAB 3079
Prv 2-3	PAntinop 9 (spacing, punct; notes; txtcrit interest) [t 3ce?]	3+ce	[#987] vh252 t164
Prv 7.3-13	PMich inv 768 (3.134) (wax tablet)	4/5/6ce	vh255 t166
Prv 5-20 \
WSol 11f }	PAntinop 8 (KS, stichs; notes; txtcrit)	3ce	[#928] vh254 t165
Sir 45 /
Wisd 1	StudPal 9.4 = PVindob G 39770	4/5ce	[#950] vh276 t179
WisdSol 4	POxy 4444 (parchment, blanks/sections, KS, stichoi)	4ce	[#] LDAB 3179 [I.A.Sparks, Journal for the Study of Judaism 3 (1972), p.149-152]
WisdSol 17.5-20	PCologne 5849 [P.Ko%ln 04 167 (C.Ro%mer), pl 2-3] (parchment, pagination, stichometric) [K. Treu, Archiv 30 (1984), p.122 no. 278a]	4ce	LDAB 3167
Sir 26-28	Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana III/424 [P.Laur. 3 pl.LII; cd-ROM, Papiri letterari della Bibl. Medicea Laurenziana] (parchment) [K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.93 no.280a]	4/5ce	LDAB 3201 [P.Laur. 03 55 (R.Pintaudi)]
Sir 29	PFlor 531	3/4ce	[#] vh281 t180A
Sir 29.13-26	PRainer Cent 27 [pl 48] = Wien, Private collection Fackelmann 12 (parchment from book-binding, miniature codex) [Treu, Archiv 31 (1985), p.60 no. 280b]	4/5ce	LDAB 3214 [K. Niederwimmer]
Sir 36, 46	PChBeat 11 (pagination)[t 4ce]	3/4ce	[#964] vh282 t181
Cant 2 + 5	PDamasc 7 (parchment, palimpsest; ektheis, stichoi [Tov]; now lost)	4/5ce	[#] vh 268 (K.Treu, Damascus] t174A
Cant 5-6	PBerlin 18196 (parch, stich, Treu pl)	4ce	vh270 t175A
Cant 5-6	PLitLond 209 (with Apol Aristid) (sp/punct)[t 4ce]	4-ce	[#952] vh269 t175
Qohelet	PHamb bil 1 (with Coptic)(sp, marks, QS)	3ce	[#998] vh263
Qohel 3	PMed [Milan] 1.13 (sp, punct, QS, stich, pl)	3ce	[#989] vh264 t172
Qohel [Eccles] 6.3-5, 8-11	PMich inv 27 [3.135] (stich format, punct at end of stich, continued line indents; PNS, vars) [t 3/4ce]	3ce	[#989 ?] vh265 t172
Tob 12	POxy 1594 (parch, txtcrit) [t 3ce]	3+ce	[#990] vh082 t186
Tob 12.6-11	Firenze, Capovilla 46 [ed M. Manfredi, Paideia Cristiana, Studi M. Naldini II (1994), p.175-181 (no plate?)]	3ce	LDAB 3110 [C.J.Wagner, Polyglotte Tobit-Synopse, Abhandl. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, Philolog.-histor. Klasse III 258, MSU 28, Göttingen 2003, pp.175-181]
Jdth 15	Cairo Ostrakon 215	3+ce	[#999] vh080

MPrs-A	Nahal Hever hand A ("leather" roll[s], two hands, A and B)(sp, blanks, paragr, ekthesis, paleo tetra) [D. Barthe/lemy. Les devanciers d'Aquila (1963); B. Lifshitz, Isr. Explor. Journ. 12 (1962), p.201-207; E.Tov, R.Kraft, P.Parsons, The Greek Minor Prophets Scroll from Nahal Hever, Disc. Jud. Desert 08] [Parsons 1+bce?]	000	[#943a] vh285 LDAB 3457
MPrs-B	Nahal Hever hand B ("leather" roll[s], two hands, A and B)(sp, blanks, paragr, ekthesis, paleo tetra) [see above]	000	[#943b] vh285 LDAB 3457
MPrs	PWash Freer (punct, paragr, KS; txtcrit)[t 4ce]	3+ce	[#W] vh284 t187
Hos 2-8	PLond BM Eg 10825 = BM inv 10924 + 2584 (Hamilton)(reused roll; Gk-Cop liturg?) [t 3ce]	3/4ce	[#] vh286 [Bell & Thompson JEA 11 (1925) 241-46] t188
Jonah 1-4	PSI 10.1164 + PBerlin/BKT 8.18 (parch) [t 4/5ce?]	4ce	[##956,975] vh289 t190
Zach 12	PGrenf 1.6 (parch)[vh 5ce]	4/5ce	[#923] vh291 t192
Isa 6.3	PatrolOrient 18.3 p.437 [t 4-6ce, "doubtful whether codex"]]	4/5ce?	t194
Isa 6.10(q)	POxy 406 (pl, quote)[t 3/4ce?]	3+ce	vh1152 t194a
Isa 8-60	PChBeat 7 + PSI 1273 + (various locations) (space/punct, KS) [t 3ce] [Cavello-Degni 2ce?]	3-ce	[#965] vh293 t195
Isa 19	PFir 8 (space/punct)	3ce
Isa 23	PLibrCong 4082B	3+ce	[#] vh295
Isa 23	PPrinc Garrett/Bell 2G ... (Hamilton)	2/3ce	[on web]
Isa 36-37	PBerlin 6772 = BKT 8.20 (palimps?) [vh=t 4ce]	2/3ce	[#902] vh297 t197
Isa 38	PVindob/Wien Rainer 8024	3ce	[#948] vh298 t198
Isa 42 etc!	POslo 11 frg 1 (sp/punct, KS; testimonia?)	4ce	[#958] vh299 t199
Isa 48	PAlex 203 (roll)(blank, KS; Treu let, pl; Jew?)	3/4ce	[#] vh300 t198A
Isa 49	PBerlin 13422 = BKT 8.21 (roll? final page of codex?)	3/4ce	[#904] vh301 t200
Isa 58.6-9	Milano, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, PMed 71.84 [ K. Treu, Archiv 28 (1982), p.96 no.1146a (no plate?)]	3ce	LDAB 3117 [S. Daris, Aegyptus 58 (1978), pp. 106-109]
Jer 2-3	PBerlin 17212 (space/punct, KS, mg notes [Treu pl])	3ce	[#837] vh303 t201a
Jer 4-5	PChBeat 8 (ed 2ce or 2/3ce; t 4ce)(sp, dots, dicolon, KS) [t 4ce, Kenyon 2/3ce, vh 2+ce]]	3ce	[#966] vh304 t202
Jer 5-6	PGenev 252 (sp/punct, KS, pagination)	4ce	[# ] vh305
Jer 17-47	PSorbonne 2250 ( mg notes; text)	4ce	[#817] vh308 t204A
Jer 18	PBarc 5 [Aegyptus 45 (1965) 70ff pl]	4ce	[#984] vh309 t204
Jer 41f	PVindob G 19891 (Hamilton)	3/4ce	[Treu 1974]
EpJer/Bar6	7QLXX EpJer (roll)	2/1bce	[#804] vh312 LDAB 3460 AlandAT144
Ezk-Dn-Est	PChBeat 9 = SIFC 12 (1935) 109f Aphroditopolis (+ various other locations) (sp, dots, strokes, blanks, paragr, KS; page nos, corrs, notes) [t 3ce; eds 2ce]	3-ce	[#967] vh315 t183/207A
Ezk 5-6	PBodl = PGrenf 1.5? (KS, hexapl signs)	3/4ce	[#922] vh314 t207
Ezk 33-34	PAntinop 10 (parchment; sp/punct, KS, txtcrit)	4ce	[#988] vh316 t208
Dan 1 OG	P(private) ed Schwartz	3ce	vh318
Dan 1++ [Thucydides, Historiae, 06.1.1-2.6 + sententiae + Daniel 1 + Susanna]	PBodmer 46 [Papiri Letterari Greci 5, pl 4] [cf. K. Treu, Archiv 30 (1984), p.122 no. 317a]	3/4ce	LDAB 4120 [Carlini 1975, 1981 B.Gagnebin, Genava NS 20 (1972), p.12; A.Carlini, A & R NS 19 (1974), p.87-88; J.Bingen, Chron d'Eg. 53 (1978), p.177; Koerner 102; Typology, p.81 n.4] (Hamilton)
Dan 1.17f Q'	PLitLond 211 Theodotion (roll?) (uncontracted QS) (parchment, reused in book binding) [Jewish?] [H.I. Bell in E.A.W. Budge, Coptic Biblical Texts in the Dialect of Upper Egypt (1912), p.xiv-xv.] [t 4ce, "not a codex"]	4-ce	[#925] vh319 t210 LDAB 3493
Dan/Bell 20f Q'	Bodl gr bib d 2 (P) (parch palimpsest [over 3/4ce Gk homily + Lat grammar])	4/5ce	[#921] vh323 t213

OTHER	(Chronological)
EpEnoch?	Qumran cave 7 frgs 4.1, 8, 12 [Epistle of Enoch? = "1 Enoch" 103] (papyrus roll) -- see also reconstruction notes and frg 8 alone [E.A.Muro]	1bce?
ExodParaph?	4Q127 (Greek paraphrase of Exod?)	1+bce
??	4Q126 (unidentified Greek, skins)	1+bce
??	7Q4 (roll) [O'Callaghan, Biblica 53 (1972), pp.91-100 suggests this is 1 Tim 3.16 - 4.3]	000?	LDAB 7341
??	Qumran cave 7 frg 5 (unidentified controversial "Mark" frg, papyrus roll) [O'Callaghan's identification with Mark 6.52-53, accepted by C.P.Thiede, Aegyptus 74 (1994), p.123-124, and A. Malnati, Pap. Lupiensia 8 (1999), pp.170-176 is unlikely: S.Enste, ZPE 126 (1999), pp.189-193; "Kein Markustext in Qumran. Eine Untersuchung"]	000?	vh1094 LDAB 6820
??	Qumran cave 7 frgs 6 (roll)	000?
unident	7Q19 (roll) [C.P.Thiede, Aegyptus 74 (1994), p.123-128 suggests this is a christian text]	000?	LDAB 7340
prayer	PFouad 203 (roll; amulet?) [no image yet]	1/2ce	vh911 LDAB 4436 [Benoit, RevBibl 59(1951) 549-565]
Solomon's judgment	POxy 2944 (E.Turner) (miniature roll, 3 cols)	1/2ce	LDAB 4502
magic text?	PHarris 55 = PGM 2.77 [D.Jordan in : P.Mirecki - M.Meyer, Magic and Ritual in the Ancient World (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 141), 2002, pp.28-29; pl] (blank verso)	2ce	vh1076 LDAB 4599
SibOr 5.484f	POsl 2.14 [S.Eitrem - L.Amundsen, Symb. Osl. 5 (1927), p. 38; W. Cro%nert, Symb.Osl. 6 (1928), p.57-58, pl] (roll? doc txt on verso)	2ce	vh581 LDAB 4797
Ahikar	PBerlin inv 11628 [Schubart pl] (roll; reused verso for account)	2/3ce	vh583
love charm	[A.S.Hunt, JEA 15, 1929, pp. 155-157 = PGM 2.32a]	2/3ce	LDAB 5121
potter's oracle	PSI 08 982 (G.Vitelli) = CPJ 03 520 [G.Cavallo e.a., Scrivere libri e documenti nel mondo antico, Mostra di papiri Firenze 1998, tav. 28 = item 33] (roll? on verso of name list) [L.Koenen, in A.Blasius - B.U.Schipper, Apokalyptik und A%gypten, OLA 107 (2002), pp.162-163]	2/3ce	LDAB 5250
Philo, Ebrietate, etc.	PSI 011 1207 (G.Vitelli)+ P. Oxy. 09 1173 (A.S.Hunt) + P.Oxy. 011 1356 (B.P.Grenfell - A.S.Hunt) + P.Oxy. 018 2158 (E.Lobel) + P.Haun. 01 8 = Oxford, Bodleian Library, c 74 (P)/1-4 + Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana + Oxford, Ashmolean Libr.+ (5) Kopenhagen, Univ. 322 [P.Haun. I, pl.IV; G.Cavallo e.a., Scrivere libri e documenti nel mondo antico, Mostra di papiri Firenze 1998, tav. 40; CPF IV.2, pl.85] [t 3ce]	2/3ce	vh696 t243 LDAB 3540 [J.R. Royse, BASP 17 (1980), p.155-165] [K.Treu, Archiv 31 (1985), p.63]
Jannes & Jambres	PVindobGr 29828+29456 [pl in Pietersma ed] (verso of papyrus roll ["gnostic" text on recto, 3-ce]; no spacing, nomina sacra uncontracted)	3ce	vh1068
Jannes & Jambres	PMich 4925 (verso of papyrus roll ["comedy" text on recto, 2/3ce], no details) [Koenen, BASP 16 (1979) 114 (the recto)]	3ce
Philo, Heres, etc.	Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, Suppl. Gr. 1120 [Turner pl.2] (2col; sp, mg marks; KS QS)	3ce	vh0695 t244 LDAB 3541
onomasticon	POxy 2745 [pl] Onomasticon of Hebrew Names [D.Rokeah, JTS 19 (1968), p.70-82] (3 cols of a papyrus roll; IAW represents Hebrew YW/YA names)	3/4ce	vh1158 LDAB 3503
onomasticon	PHeid 1359 = PHeidelberg 1 5 Onomasticon of Hebrew Names (papyrus roll/sheet; IW and IAW represent Hebrew YW/YA names)	3/4ce	vh1136 LDAB 5520
OdeSol 11	PBod 11 (strokes, blanks, pagination) [same MS as 3 Cor, Jude, Melito, 1-2Pet, hymn][ed 3ce, t 4ce]	3/4ce	vh569(138)
martyrology?	Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, Suppl. Gr. 1294 [Weitzmann, Ancient Book Illumination, pl.51; B.Legras, Lire en Egypte d'Alexandre à l'Islam, 2002, pl.IV] (roll, 4cols, illustrated)	3/4ce	vh856 LDAB 4508
Paris "magic" texts	Paris, Bibliothe/que Nationale, Suppl. Gr. 574 [L'art copte en Egypte. 2000 ans de christianisme (Paris, 2000), p.58; H.-D. Betz, The "Mithras Liturgy", pp.228-243] (several texts) [C. Wessely, Denkschr. Wien. Akad. 1888, p.27-208; K. Preisendanz, PGM 01 IV; Neugebauer-Van Hoesen, Astr. Pap. Ostr. 126; E. Heitsch, Griech. Dichterfragmente I, p.181 LIX.3, 4, 6, 7 and 9-14; H.-D. Betz, The "Mithras Liturgy", Studien und Texte zu Antike]	3/4ce	vh0580+1074 LDAB 5564
Moses magic text?	PLugdBat 2 W = Leiden Rijksmuseum van Oudheden J 395 (PGM 13)	3/4ce	vh1071
magic prayer	PGM 2.22b = Berlin, Aegyptisches Museum, Papyrussammlung P. 13895 (amulet?)	4ce	LDAB 5598
magic charm	PLaur 04 149 (R.Pintaudi) = Suppl. Mag. 02 91 [pl. 106; CD-ROM, Papiri letterari della Bibl. Medicea Laurenziana, 3.508] (sheet/amulet?)	4ce	LDAB 5646
EpEnoch + ps-Ezek	PChBeat 12 + PMich 5552 (pagination in diff hand) ["1 Enoch" 97-107 and ps-Ezek, Melito]	4ce	vh578+579 t222
ApclElij ++	PSI 1.7 (Florence) [same MS has ProtJacobi; also similar to ActJn vh604]	4ce	vh568+600
6 Ezra 16	POxy 1010 [pl] (parch)	4ce	vh574
SibOr 5.498ff	PFlor 389 [pl] (parch)	4ce	vh582 t238
Jannes & Jambres	PChBeat 16 [pl Pietersma ed] (papyrus codex; occasional spacing, punct; odd nomina sacra KOS, QOS, ANQPOS)
liturgical fragments	POxy 2068 (A.S. Hunt) (2col of a roll, verso blank) [G.D.Kilpatrick, Greek Rom. Byz. Stud 5 (1964) 222 n.14 "Jewish"]	4ce	vh966 LDAB 5714
AstronEnoch	POxy 2069.3+5 ["1 Enoch" 77-78, perhaps by same scribe as vh577]	4+ce	vh576
AstronEnoch	POxy 2069.1-2+4 ["1 Enoch" 85-87, perhaps by same scribe as vh576]	4+ce	vh577
ApclBar 12-14	POxy 403 (corrections)	4/5ce	vh573
Philo, Deo + Hermetica	Berlin, Aegyptisches Museum, Papyrussammlung P. 17027 [K. Stahlschmidt, Aegyptus 22 (1942), p.161-176]	4/5ce	vh697 t245 LDAB 3542
magic charm	PWashUniv 02 75 (Z.M.Packman) = St Louis (MO), Washington University 242 [Suppl. Mag. 70] (amulet)	4/5ce	LDAB 5837
amulet against fever	StudPal 020 292 = Wien, Papyrussammlung Nationalbibliothek, G. 8034 (PGM 2.47) (parchment, amulet sheet)	4/5ce	vh 1050 LDAB 5860
magic formula	PSI 01 29 (L. Cammelli) = PGM 2.35 [G.Cavallo e.a., Scrivere libri e documenti nel mondo antico, Mostra di papiri Firenze 1998, tav. 32; cd-ROM, Papiri letterari della Bibl. Medicea Laurenziana] (amulet sheet)	4/5ce	LDAB 5955
medical magical?	POxy 1384 = PGM 02 47 = Glasgow University Library (sheet? amulet?)	5ce	vh0584 LDAB 3237 [Pack 2410]
AscIsa 2-4	PAmherst 1 (pagination, corrections)	5/6ce	vh572
prayer amulet	POxy 1152 (Princeton Seminary) = PGM 6a [Wessely, AMC 2, p.403-404 pl] (amulet sheet)	5/6ce	vh960 LDAB 6150
Philo	Berlin, Aegyptisches Museum, Papyrussammlung P. 21342 [W. Brashear, Proc. XXth Int. Congr. Kopenhagen, p.290 no.7, pl]	6/7ce	LDAB 3543

early gospels	see vh 585-602 (and canonical section)
early Paul	see lists of MSS (ChBeat 2, Trobridge, etc.)


COMPARED
style fancy	elaborate calligraphy
style plainer	fairly plain calligraphy
"biblical uncial" style	developed style in 3rd-4th centuries
hanging	tendency for letters to hang from upper (imagined) horizontal (compare Tobiad document [Zenon papyri])
spacing	compare 2ce fragment of G.John
sectioning & paragraphing	organization of sections (see also G.Thomas [3ce], Alexandrinus [5ce])
tetragramm	Semiticized presentation of tetragrammaton
as KURIOS	Greek representations of tetragrammaton
in "Magic"	representations of tetragrammaton on amulets, etc.
nomina sacra	developed approaches to sacred and frequent names/terms

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rak//earlylxx/earlypaplist.html#canon