That post is in itself a "value judgment." The use of the term "anti-Mormon" in describing those who counter the message of the 52,000 (and growing) mormon missionaries going about the world claiming daily to Christians that their Christian faith is bogus and the only way to salvation is through arcane temple rituals done by "the one true church in the world" is a "value judgment" as is the tone of your post.
Would you ask a similar question about "anti-Christianity" of the FR mormons whose religion was steeped in hatred of Christianity for 150 years?
Jim Robinson would certainly be called "anti-mormon" (and has been on FR) if this is your judgment.
Perhaps you missed this post:
My position stands. The so-called book of Mormon is false gospel, ie, fiction. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity or the Word of God.
Look up false prophets in KJV.
Must be a flaw (among many flaws) in my up-bringing.
Perhaps instead of dropping in on just one thread you might search the Religion Forum for articles that have been posted for several years with actual mormon doctrine as sources before making any calls.
Nossir. It is not. It is an explicit distancing of myself from the entire discussion of Mormonism.
I am merely curious to see how deep the is the commitment, on the side of those who oppose Mormonism. Are they so delighted with the prevention of a Mormon in the White House, that any and all other considerations pale in comparison?