Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Campion
Because I can't imagine Him being pleased at this.

I can very much imagine Him being not pleased with His Church since the early 1960s.

7 posted on 07/14/2012 5:57:07 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature not nurture TM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: steve86; Campion; wideawake; Robert Drobot; Gillibrand

Gentlemen,
until the statement is released, there is no news here, and thus far, I’ve seen no indication of leaks either. Instead of jumping, let’s see what is actually said. Give it time.


8 posted on 07/14/2012 6:15:17 PM PDT by sayuncledave (et Verbum caro factum est (And the Word was made flesh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: steve86

I don’t doubt that He’s not pleased. But it remains His Church, not Fellay’s or Williamson’s, and the traditional doctrine of obedience — obey your lawful superiors unless they command you to sin — is still in force. So go ahead, make the case that for SSPX to be in obedience to the Pope is equivalent to obeying a *command* to *sin*.


10 posted on 07/14/2012 7:05:05 PM PDT by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson