ALL: This is what we call a poster who is refusing to pay attention to reality:
* "The thread goes in the direction you steered it for more than a hundred political attack posts, with ZERO about the ISM until Elsie redirects the focus momentarily..." (MHGinTN, post #196)
* "Your posts, coming 120 posts on, are the FIRST hint of any discussion of Romney’s religion, yet this thread was posted as a ‘religion forum’ thread." [MHGinTN, post #144)
* "...the first 100 plus posts are SOLELY attack politics with nothing to do with the religion forum..." [MHGinTN, post #195)
This is yet a third attempt to bring reality to a poster...in Post #2 I discussed about a dozen "ISM" imbedded concepts.
And I even used the word "MormonISM" three times...: "There is no bottom-line in MormonISM! There is no bedrock doctrine that cannot be replaced! There isn't even an Ultimate god in MormonISM...Nobody knows who the gods are that were part of the council which appointed the god of this world -- a former man, say Mormons."
But, per M.H. there were supposedly
..."ZERO" posts about the "ISM"
...-- there wasn't even a "FIRST hint of any discussion of Romney's religion" until Elsie posted...
...and there was "nothing to do with the religion forum" ANY of those "first 100 plus posts."
And now, that I've had to painfully post the obvious correction (again)...his pride still won't let him be corrected and retract his statement/accusation toward Elsie. Right now, M.H., your accusation of him is STILL on the thread table. When will you withdraw that falsehood? Or are your false statements beyond correction?
Sorry...but concepts like "ZERO," "First," and "nothing" aren't up for your silly redefinition attempts.
LOL ... dig something out after post #2 until about a hundred more posts, then you might have some creds. Are you trying for the title in Inman squares, or just a self-appointed ... aw, never mind. You’re doing too good a job of outing yourself. Have nice day
FRiend, despite what this confused person posted, I have not made any scurrilous accusation toward you on this thread. ... I seem to remember Delphi User posting the same sort of ‘blessing’ technique as was used here, though. Please, FRiend, don’t be misguided by a mistaken accusation.
Chill, fellow Inmen; as we have more important fish to fry.
In the spirit of dearly departed Rodney...
"Can't we all..."
Chill, fellow Inmen; as we have more important fish to fry.
In the spirit of dearly departed Rodney...
"Can't we all..."