And one of the standard pack of non-c's said in reply to Swedenborgians would be a heretical sect based on their teachings of the Trinity so I would not regard them as Protestant since this heresy is rejected by Protestants and Catholics. they said Anybody who disagrees with any Catholic on anything gets the label of *heretic* slapped on them to the point where it's meaningless -- not a peep from you, boatie.. in fact all the defenders of the dogma of sola scriptura defended Swedenborgian doctrine (that The Infinite God of the Universe (Jehovah) came into this world within the human form of Jesus Christ because it was a personal interpretation and because this was a good chance to start a hit them caflix thread.. shame on you'all
Swedenborg as a product of sola scriptura? Really? It strains credulity. He was an interplanetary soul tripper. Dreams and visions, conversations with angels and demons. I’m sure he would’ve make a fabulous FR poster, but there’s no reasonable way to link Sola Scriptura to his clearly extrabiblical treasure trove of lunacy.
BTW, just as a footnote, I used to work with a fellow who was also a member of the interplanetary set, as he imagined it. A belief system called eckancar, involving astral projection. He said he went to Mars, tethered to Earth by a silver cord issuing from his navel. He was a large, unfit man, and this was an unpleasant image. Sadly, he passed away while shoveling snow. I hate to think about the contrast between his fantasies and the reality that awaited him. Sigh.
Peace,
SR
I thought you aren't supposed to make a thread about another Freeper. Just because you pick a thread from two years ago or another that I had NO input at all on, it doesn't mean I agree with those who do not believe in the deity of Christ and the triune nature of our God. I HAVE defended the truth of Scripture on that subject many times. If you want to play that game, I can probably find hundreds of threads where you picked sides with an atheist/agnostic against non-Catholics or where you failed to make a "peep". That's not how it works here. If asked about the subject, I have never had any qualms about defending my beliefs. But, I don't have to answer to you. I answer to my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and Him only. If I choose to make comments on a thread, look at those comments to see what I believe, don't judge me from silence and assume from it that I agree with what another person says. I'M NOT ON TRIAL HERE. Take your petty little pity party somewhere else!
I repeated --> I've never seen either say anything to the non-Trinitarians who would post their objections to the Trinity. Nothing, not a word. it's almost as if they agree with them.
Never, have I seen the bunch of non-Catholics disagree with the Unitarians, Jehovah's Witnesses etc. in their midst when they talk about the Trinity being a Catholic incorrect concept.
perhaps this non-Catholic club accepts any creed, even Mormons as long as they are in the same 'let's try attackin' Caflix"
What a bunch of losers.
So, a poster puts herself on trial saying "give me proof I support non-Trinitarians" and then starts crying when proof is shown? Incroyable!