I don’t agree with the theology of Mormonism. However, Martin Luther once said that he’d rather be ruled by a competent Turk than an incompetent Christian. In this case, I’d rather be led by a competent Mormon, than an incompetent, destructive, culturally Muslim Atheist posing as a Christian.
And for stating your honest opinion you will be told your christianity is in question, that you are insulting God by siding with the enemy, that ... well, you’ll see. Enjoy the show hereafter.
+1
Amen...
(Well, that's funny...MOST Freepers willing to comment on the subject of whether they'd vote for a Muslim POTUS or not -- your "Turk" -- say "no" to that...I wonder why it is that whenever a FREEPER trots out this quote from Luther, that the hundreds of FREEPERs who've indicated they would NOT vote for a Muslim POTUS never contend that quote since it's now being used to support Romney???)
Why don't you take your own informal FREEPER survey and ask how many of them would vote for a "competent" Muslim POTUS...???
All the polls I looked at in 2007-2008 suggested THEN that 50% or more -- perhaps even 60% -- would not vote for a Muslim POTUS. (Not exactly strange in a still "fresh" 9/11 cultural environment)
Even Romney told the Christian Science Monitor in 2007 that he would NOT place a Muslim on his Cabinet!!!
See: Remember when Romney said he wouldn’t put a Muslim in the cabinet? He made his Mormonism relevant
IT is up to us in Nov to REMOVE 0, and NOT INSTALL his EVIL TWIN. I don’t drink the gop koolaide, I did a lot of research, there is but a dimes difference in the 2. If it talks like a Republican, votes like a demoRAT, signs legislation that only a demoRAT would sign they it must be a DEMORAT with a R after it’s name called a RINO!
And for every one who moans about Snowe, Graham, Collins and the former Specter this is what you will get if you vote for the RINO Romney.
I agree with post #2
Yeah I came to a similar conclusion. We have a non-Christian who hates this country and is inept, and we have a non-Christian who would like this country to do well, and appears less inept than the America-hater. Do both suck in multiple areas? Yes. Does the America hater suck in more ways and areas than the other guy? Yes, in far more areas, 100% opposed to anything he does or says. Would they govern identically? No. Does one appear to have the capacity to make better decisions given their views on the country? Probably. Would a 2nd-term lame-duck America hater be better than a first term guy who has no ill will towards the country, and would like a second term? No.
HMMmm...I wasn't aware that Romney is competent.
His record is NOT all that great.
I guess you are NOT aware that Mitt is either a deceived MORMON or a deceiving one; a heretic in the classical sense of the word; posing as a Christian.
Remember there are many that don’t believe in the Constitution and religious freedom...keep your powder dry.
I always wonder about the people who were banned in the past for saying something like that. It’s ok to say it now, but what about the people before the policy change?
I haven't read through the entire thread, so forgive me if someone else has already raised this point.
Most historians do not believe that Martin Luther ever said that. The best work on this is by Dr. Gene Edward Veith. You can hear an interview with him on this topic at theamericanview.com.