That wasn’t the question. The question was how can you as a conservative RC vote for someone who is pro-abortion?
If you answer is that Romney is not as bad as BHO, that is answer. It is not an answer to ask me why I wouldn’t do everything possible to get rid of BHO. It is quite a leap, to make those equal.
However, I do know when Romney changed his position on life issue. (Notice the 2012 position, he is not pro-life)
Here is the time line:
Romney’s evolution on abortion:
Romney said I am not comfortable with my status on abortion and want to be called pro-life. (2012)
Romney’s government health care provides $50 to free abortions. (current)
Romney appointed pro-choice judges to his court, they are still serving. (current)
Romney said Roe v Wade should be overturned and left to the states, so that makes me pro-life. (2011)
Romney supports stem cell research. (2004)
Romney said abortion should be kept legal, safe and rare and will honor that commitment. (2002)
Romney said I am committed to preserving abortions rights. (2002)
Romney whether you are for abortion or not is relevant, the individual should decide. (1999)
Romney said is a debate with Kennedy that he was more pro-choice than Kennedy. (1994)
Romney was applauded by plan parenthood for his pro-abortion stand. (1994)
You didn’t like my answer because I didn’t take your bait.
TODAY, Romney is Pro-life.
Therefore, I am NOT voting for someone who is pro-abortion.
And your question has no point.
Dr. Bernard Nathenson, was once head of NARAL and this nations most prolific abortionist.
The last 20 years of his life, he was one of this nations strongest Pro-Life advocates.
There are many examples of people changing their views on the issue of life.
THAT is how I reconcile supporting Romney!