>>>at what point in reading the entries on this thread and the article of its origin did you imagine the thread was about Milt Rominy
>>>Let me help you out, the first reference is found in post #2.
Actually, Romney is referenced in the first, second and third posts.
Objectively, I’d say it was much about Romney from the get-go.
That’s what prompted my first post as well.
It might not be hijacking the thread to discuss whether Romney being LDS, by itself, is sufficient grounds for a person who is not LDS to vote for him. If it could be kept civil, it might make a decent religious discussion.
I guess it would kinda depend on your definition of CIVIL.
I've always heard that there are 2 things you don't discuss in polite company.
And we are doing them BOTH in this thread.