Stretching the truth more than a little bit, eh? Firstly, kostka was not a "professional" agnostic
secondly, he is orthodox and having a crisis of faith, or rather, had a crisis of faith.
Thirdly, he argued with you on facts, not on interpretation, and on that you lost, repeatedly
fourth -- I will agree with an agnostic on facts, not on theology -- do you agree with a Unitarian on his denial of Christ's divinity?
Why band with a Unitarian or non-Trinitarian just because they are non-Catholic? Is this some sense of "let's band with anyone and everyone who isn't of orthodoxy"?
Somehow I just KNEW this would be the route taken! Kosta was a PROFESSED agnostic. That is not the same thing as a professional agnostic. And it was professed because he openly stated more than a few times that he WAS and we had many discussions about it. So who is stretching the truth here, Cronos??? It IS curious that you side with him when you state he "argued with me on facts" and "on that I lost repeatedly". Since most of our arguments related to faith, the existence of God, the role of faith, the Messianic prophecies of Scripture, etc., then where do YOUR loyalties lie? You only prove my contention, which also proves your own hypocrisy. A lesson I remember from Catholic school: "Clean off your own doorstep before you try to clean off someone else's." At least that one was true.
fourth -- I will agree with an agnostic on facts, not on theology -- do you agree with a Unitarian on his denial of Christ's divinity? Why band with a Unitarian or non-Trinitarian just because they are non-Catholic? Is this some sense of "let's band with anyone and everyone who isn't of orthodoxy"?
No, I do not agree with anyone who denies the Deity of Christ and I have said so numerous times. By the same token as you claim here, I also agree with those when they state facts and apparently, you seem to deny anyone could possibly be correct in criticizing the Roman Catholic Church. How's your doorstep?