You do realize, don't you, that "micro-evolution" is not a scientific concept? And it also is not a Biblical concept? It has every appearance of being invented by young-earth creationist charlatans (YECCs) to try to convince people they aren't liars when they tell them that the evidence of evolution that is all around us isn't real.
So, you personally are unaware of the evidence for a common ancestor. You do realize that just because you, personally, don't know something doesn't mean the knowledge doesn't exist, don't you? In fact, everything you could possibly want to know about common ancestry, and how we determine it, is probably right there on Google (search "common ancestry"). That is, if you have a genuine desire to learn about it.
One last thing: you might want to consider where you got the idea that scientists are trying to eliminate religion. I highly suspect it was from YECCs--they make that claim frequently. If they can't convince people that scientists are "out to get them", then people won't give them as much money.
Yup. You've hit it on the head. That's my entire argument summed up in one sentence. To re-state it: "My brain isn't big enough to understand Evolution, therefore Evolution isn't true." That's precisely what I'm saying.
[/HEAVY sarcasm]
You really wish people argued with you at that level, don't you? I actually understand a fair amount about science. I could make a case in favor of Evolution if I wanted too -- but I wouldn't believe it. The point is: I understand your side of the debate. However, it is pretty obvious to me that you do not have an understanding of the non-Evolution side of the debate. All you have is scorn and contempt. You do not undertand your opponent -- you do not want to understand your opponent -- and so you make ineffectual arguments.