Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: whattajoke; annalex
whattajoke: "Bravo to you, BroJoeK, Bravo."

Thanks so much for your very kind words, I hugely appreciate them.

My schedule sometimes allows adequate time to do a thought-out response here, and that's time I enjoy and consider well spent.

When you consider my arguments in larger context, remember I am making the case for something called "theistic evolutionism", and that is the teaching of most Christian denominations.
So this is not "believer versus anti-believer".

Curiously, annalex continues to pretend that his (I assume "his" not "her") views are not based on religion, but rather on pure science.
I don't believe that for a second, and I'm anticipating this now lengthy discussion will eventually bring out the truth of it.

Anyway, thanks again!

151 posted on 05/26/2012 2:48:12 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK; whattajoke
annalex continues to pretend that his (I assume "his" not "her") views are not based on religion, but rather on pure science.

I, too, find theistic evolution compatible with Catholicism and I am Catholic. It is evolutionists who often credit themselves with a proof that God is not "a necessary hypothesis" anymore, and bring in the anti-religion sentiment to a discussion of science. Now you did it again. I am a man. You can call me Alex. Ann is my wife.

157 posted on 05/27/2012 8:02:34 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson