[Lee N. Field]

You attempted to use a response I made to an article as some "evidence" that I believe that there is more than one way to salvation.

I calls 'em as I sees 'em. The message changes, the gospel changes. It's disturbing that a Christian would even think this.

I didn't expect you to be able to refute the article for many reasons, first of which is the fact that you would be required to deal with Scripture that you have had to discard and deny to make your "doctrines" work.

Scriptures like Galatians 3:29?

Why should I try? I'll just get hissed at.

[GiovannaNicoletta]

I calls 'em as I sees 'em. The message changes, the gospel changes. It's disturbing that a Christian would even think this.

And you still can produce not one shred of evidence that I think there's more than one way to salvation. Lying about other people is not the way to defend your own "position", such as it is.

Scriptures like Galatians 3:29?

And which of the hundreds of Scriptures that detail God's plans and promises for the Jews are cancelled out by Galatians 3:29?

And in what Scripture does the Holy Spirit, not fallen men who adhere to a demonic doctrine, tell us that any of His promises and plans to His chosen people are null and void?

[count-your-change]

When the first Israelite king was chosen it was because the people wanted a king they could see and that would lead them in battle. National pride was involved.
But they already had a king, Jehovah, and by their demand the Israelites were rejecting Him.

Now the same error is being repeated, Christ has been appointed as heavenly king but now the added demand is that Christ leave his heavenly throne, take up flesh again and ride into Jerusalem.

Gal. 3:29? Those Scriptures are hard to read with the eyes pointed downward instead of heavenward.