To: Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Captain Beyond; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; ...
Ping
I thought the author did a good job explaining why supersessionism is in error. I would be interested in your thoughts as well.
2 posted on
04/30/2012 7:55:33 PM PDT by
wmfights
To: wmfights
The author has chosen a position and then used Scripture to force his argument.
Time to be a Berean. Study the Scripture first. Scripture is it’s own interpretor, it’s own dictionary.
I am neither a supersessionist nor do I follow Replacement Theology.
I’m an old lady who reads her Bible.
To: wmfights
AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN!
!ABSOLUTELY INDEED!
EXCELLENT POINTS! I trust you pinged the END TIMES LIST.
8 posted on
04/30/2012 8:43:13 PM PDT by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: wmfights; count-your-change; GiovannaNicoletta
Here are my thoughts: http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/israel-chosenorforgotten.html
“As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes. “ (Romans 11:28)
Anyone who has done much evangelization among the Jewish understands that the former, while the relative remnant who will come to Christ will realize that latter. To the glory of God.
33 posted on
05/01/2012 12:55:23 PM PDT by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a damned+morally destitute sinner,+trust Him to forgive+save you,+live....)
To: wmfights
Christians did not "replace" Jews. God's family of believing Jews grew into all those who believe the Messiah came and conquered death and is God Himself.
That's not supersessionism. That's Christianity.
Or why be a Christian?
52 posted on
05/02/2012 5:41:55 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson