So how about you show us where what he said is not what he said? You claim the quote is “lifted” to try to portray that what he said is not what we think he meant. Can you show that he meant something different than what he said?
You wrote:
“So how about you show us where what he said is not what he said?”
Ligouri was quoting St. Anselm. Why didn’t you mention that when you quoted him?
“You claim the quote is “lifted” to try to portray that what he said is not what we think he meant.”
Read post #217. At this point there can be no doubt that you “lifted” the quote. Also, the way the quotes were deceptively cut show that in fact he meant something different than what you’re claiming. That is obvious and irrefutable. I already demonstrated that when I posted the full quotes. That’s probably why you won’t use those quotes, right?
“Can you show that he meant something different than what he said?”
I already conclusively showed - using his own words - that he meant something radically different than you were implying. It is not what “he said” but what you failed to post that he said that is key. I also demonstrated that with your own wrods. Remember?
Is this:
“No one other than a Catholic would claim they get things from Mary.”
the same as this:
“No... Catholic would claim they get things from Mary.”
No, the two statements are not the same. And I guarantee no one would find it honest for someone to take a quote that says “No one other than a Catholic” and change it to “No... Catholic” but that is exactly the sort of thing you have posted.