You wrote:
“He has the book . I gave him Ligouri’s book myself so don’t accuse him of going to any anti catholic site .”
That’s a pity because that means he deceptively edited the quotes himself. Thanks for stipulating that with your post.
“He has the entire book and the book is to old for copyright so he can post lots of it straight from the book .”
Yes, he can post “lots”. Strange that he can’t seem to post complete quotes. Why do you think that is?
“The only thing mindless about it is the trash that is in the book that so many people believe .”
No matter what “many people believe” it would still be wrong to deceptively cut the quotes. Do anti-Catholics consider it to be morally justified to be dishonest?
“Oh and by the way the book has a stamp of approval from the catholic church too”
No reason why it shouldn’t. Does the deceptive quote cutting of such a book have your sect’s stamp of approval or is that something left up to the individual sectarian?
“Your accusing him of lifting stuff off of anti catholic sites sounds an awful lot like projection to me .”
Well, I will no longer ask him about that since you have already admitted that he has the book and - as you have now tacitly admitted - is deceptively quoting the book entirely on his own. Thank you for so graciously stepping forward and confirming that anti-Catholics are dishonest people who will not hesitate to stoop so low as to deceptively cut words from quotes in attacking the Catholic Church. You have been more of a help to me than you probably realize. Thanks.
Not only that but it’s the typical way many try to get out of facing the fact that what we say about what the Catholics believe is true and contained in the RCC documents. This whole “lifted off of anti-Catholic websites” meme gets old. Why not discuss the information? If you believe the information to be wrong show how it’s wrong. I’ll readily admit that I’m “anti-Catholic”. I view it as a cult which has perverted the teachings of scripture. They can’t defend their beliefs from scripture.