Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd
You want to equate drug usage with internet addiction, eating too may carbs, exercise...?

I'm not necessarily equating them....but how much government intrusion do you want to make sure people don't do those things? We want drunk drivers off the road, so what do we do, we monitor drivers...we don't ban alcohol, or make sure people don't drink. And if you truly want to decrease drug usage, use the power of social sanctions, as I mentioned earlier with how you no longer see pregnant women smoking or drinking....I don't necessarily think that's because they know it's bad for the baby, it's because they know that any one who see them doing it will be appalled, and they would be outcast.

85 posted on 03/08/2012 9:58:34 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

Social sanctions. I get that.

And right now the pervasive social sanctions in America are all about keeping drugs illegal.

Even California turned down Prop. 19 which would have legalized pot.


111 posted on 03/08/2012 10:20:53 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson