[RFEngineer]

“Don’t MAKE me have to show any evidence!!”

You’ll probably need to help. These folks are not very cerebral - They’ve been caught on the outside of the Constitution and are tap-dancing trying to argue a statement I never made.

But really, make sure you you don’t make stuff up by combining partial snippets of different threads like you did in your previous post to me - as I said, it’s really beneath you, and I think upon reflection you’d agree it’s fundamentally dishonest.

I’d accept your apology if you’d give it.

[AnTiw1]

you know most of us are exmormon

and yet you take the side of the cult against people who experienced the cult

out of your own mouth you refuse to read any testimony or lds documentation

and ascribe our posting such as an unconstitutional violation of freedom of religion...lol

by your logic, the people who leave scientology and then expose scientology’s practices, are bigots

by your logic, the children who inform on catholic pedophile priests, if they don’t keep silent, are the abusers and the priests are the victims

by your logic, if people who escape from islam, form groups that speak against the hatred of islam, those who speak out are now the haters

when you get tired of waving the Constitution like a flag, you might actually read it...freedom of expression, freedom to assemble, freedom of speech

and btw i really don’t give a d whether you’re mormons or mormon stooges...you’re on the field on their side of the line of scrimmage, and what jersey you’re putting on for us today is irrelevant...because if you were a mormon you have a very religious commandment to lie when it suits the needs of the church

“i’m not for Romney, BUT” “I’m not Mormon, BUT” = Mormonbutts Mittbutts Romneybutts just a bunch of asses walking backwards through FR looking for places to fart

[Elsie]

I’d accept your apology if you’d give it.

I'm sorry you guys are having a long distance discussion; or sound I say monologues?

[Elsie]

I’d accept your apology if you’d give it.

I'm sorry you guys are having a long distance discussion; or should I say monologues?

[Elsie]

But really, make sure you you don’t make stuff up by combining partial snippets of different threads like you did in your previous post to me - as I said, it’s really beneath you, and I think upon reflection you’d agree it’s fundamentally dishonest.

DIFFERENT threads?

I'm sure you have one OTHER than this one that you are thinking about; so why not post a LINK to it?

[reaganaut]

You’ll probably need to help. These folks are not very cerebral - They’ve been caught on the outside of the Constitution

- - - - - -
ROFL. This from a guy who doesn’t even understand what the Constitution says.

So, how are we outside the Constitution? Prove it . You keep making this same asinine statement when it simply is not true and our posts have proved you wrong.