“No, it looks like a genuine conversion experience for Newt. And it looks like prejudice from others.”
You just told me that you didn’t say I was prejudiced over Newt’s Catholic Conversion, now you say I am. Make up your mind. I know I’ve got you a bit rattled, but this is getting ridiculous.
I wonder if you would also support making allowances to have Newt elected Pope, seeing as how nothing seems to faze your lofty opinion of him. (I’m sure you’ll see the humor in this statement, as I am just kidding)
You wrote:
“You just told me that you didn’t say I was prejudiced over Newt’s Catholic Conversion, now you say I am. Make up your mind.”
I made no contradition. I corrected you on your mistake. Learn to read.
“I know I’ve got you a bit rattled, but this is getting ridiculous.”
A bit rattled? No, I’m use dto dealing with prejudiced anti-Catholics and they don’t rattle me.
“I wonder if you would also support making allowances to have Newt elected Pope, seeing as how nothing seems to faze your lofty opinion of him. (I’m sure you’ll see the humor in this statement, as I am just kidding)”
My view of Newt is simple: he is a flawed man and sinner like everyone else. There is no reason to doubt his conversion. He is neither a perfect man nor a perfect Republican. I have never met a perfect man nor a perfect Republican. You have yet to present any actual evidence for your view. Why is that?