You wrote:
“You trust a politician who has betrayed wives and conservatism.”
It has nothing to do with trust.
“You think it’s pure coincidence that he would convert/annul just in time for the primaries.”
I don’t think that’s what happened. He converted in March of 2009. The primaries began a few weeks ago. Don’t forget he entered RCIA no later than September of 2008. That means he decided to convert 3 years before the primaries.
“I don’t and I don’t.”
Three years. You are clearly way off.
“After his demonstrated behavior that does not fit the trust that is being placed in him by conservatives, You claim I’m prejudiced against Newt because he is a converted Catholic.”
Nope. I never claimed your “prejudiced against Newt because he is a converted Catholic.” I noted your prejudice for something else.
“Character matters in elections, and it should matter to you, too.”
It does. Feel free to keep making mistakes.
“That means he decided to convert 3 years before the primaries.”
Friend, his conversion 3 years before the primaries was “just in time” politically speaking for these primaries.
“I noted your prejudice for something else.”
Don’t be wishy-washy. You already are out of line, why not go the rest of the way and detail what the heck you are talking about instead of hiding behind squishy rhetoric.