>>I think I see the source of this misunderstanding: in every example you are taking as primary and absolute what we all know to be secondary and contingent.<<
You may think it’s “secondary an contingent” but scripture would say otherwise.
>I think I see the source of this misunderstanding: in every example you are taking as primary and absolute what we all know to be secondary and contingent.<< You may think it’s “secondary an contingent” but scripture would say otherwise. Wait a sec. You misunderstood what I was saying.
I was saying that everything about God is primary and absolute.
Everything about a creature is secondary and contingent.
Are we on the same page here?