Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
As I said, Paul rejected circumcision as a requirement for salvation. He did not reject the Torah instruction for Yah’s children in order that they may gain the blessing that comes from obedience. That is for them personally to make. It is between they & YHVH, what ever YHVH prods their heart to do. FYI...Cutting off Paul's words in order to make it look like Torah is done away with is the work of the adversary.

1Co 7:19 The circumcision is naught, and the uncircumcision is naught, but the guarding of the commands of Elohim does matter! [Footnote: 1Rom. 2:26-29] 20 Let each one remain in the same calling in which he was called

Rom 2:26 So, if an uncircumcised one watches over the righteousnesses of the Torah, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned as circumcision?
27 And the uncircumcised by nature, who perfects the Torah, shall judge you who notwithstanding letter and circumcision are a transgressor of the Torah!

211 posted on 12/28/2011 8:29:09 AM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: patlin

Nope, you said Paul did not reject circumcision. When, in fact Paul did —> go read Galatians...


213 posted on 12/28/2011 9:24:10 AM PST by Cronos (Party like it's 12 20, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson