You still haven’t presented any evidence. You have provided no logical argument at all dealing with how this is about Christmas - the Nativity of Christ - but is completely devoid of such imagery. You have yet to deal with the obvious problem of how the pregnancy test comntradicts - both anachronisticly and as a statement denying revelation - scripture. You still believe liberals. You apparently will continue to fail.
That question has been asked, and answered. Quit lying about the what I have said or not said....
Anachronisticly? That word doesn't make sense in context. In fact, since pregnancy test were not available back in the Gregorian year zero, or the year 2, or -5 or -6, whenever one wishes to set the date of the birth, it is painfully obvious that the image WAS NOT a representative example of just how she knew. It would be an impossibility. As I have explained, including touching upon why such was used as a prop, or device to invoke thought.
That has all been asked and answered too. How many times do I have to say it, before you will drop the ridiculous lies that I didn't? One hundred times? When will you tire of your childish game?
Perhaps you should ask yourself why you continue to deny, even lie about what I have said, or not? I think I already know...
I would repeat and or rephrase the entire argument, but to what avail? Nothing so far I have said so far, has been acknowledged to have even been said at all. But all one has to do is scroll up, to find the answers you say do not exist.
You still believe liberals.
Well, that particular Anglican congregation doesn't have a record of lying to my face, and lying about what I myself have said or not, trying to create the impression that such lies are true, like SOME PEOPLE I know!
If expecting anything like an honest discussion from you was part of things, I'll need to wait for another day. That much is abundantly obvious, but was not unexpected.
One thing I have not failed at, is bringing to light the underlying pathology which lead many to be so immediately offended by the image. You'll have to go re-read my admittedly too lengthy comments to ferret out what I mean by that. Thank you for your assistance. It has been invaluable.