Baiting if I’ve ever seen it.
Working on the presumption of guilt or knowledge of a position held is intellectually dishonest debate tactic and only amounts to flame baiting.
Because this is not an unrecognized tactic from Catholics, I’m not going there. Until there is some integrity in the questions asked, they will remain unanswered.
Assume the worse if you will. It will happen anyway, no matter what I say.
Man, that was a work of beauty. Apparently that’s what passes for religious discussion; assuming of course one is either horribly ashamed of their own religion’s stance on a subject, or just too plain ignorant to be able to explain it.
Metmom: baiting
Really? On what basis does this sect say that the Virgin Birth was false?
“Assume the worse if you will. It will happen anyway, no matter what I say.” — though if some group is exceptionally cagey about what they believe or not — not even explaining why they deny the virgin birth, what can one do?
Here it is Christams week and the celebration of Jesus birth, our Savior coming to the world... yet they still cannot see Him as first and foremost....
BUT.....It remains all about....”The son is given”...”The Savior”...”THe King”.....and He shall be called “Jesus”...to those who love and serve Him above all others.
Praise God for His great love to us all.. that HE would come to dwell among men in the form of the Christ-child!!!!
The Old Testament declared......”He’s coming!”.....the Gospels declared....’He’s here!’.... and the rest reveal... “He’s coming again!”