If Dawkins’ position is that the rejection of Adam and Eve as literal history implies either lack of God or at least lack of a Judeo-Christian God, I agree with him. It’s just he takes the position that there is no God and I take the position that there was an Adam and Eve.
People trying to find a compromise position halfway along are in a difficult spot.
Incorrect.
A person’s faith can be STRONGER when he sees the profound SYMBOLIC implications of the Adam & Eve story.