No problem, we've seen this garbage before. Your "Bible Study" group must have quite a collection.
Do be careful though. Garbage is allowed on Open Threads up to very broad limits, but it's possible you can slip up and, accidentally of course, click on a banned website and repost their material en masse after slight cleansing.
I think that might become a tad obvious violation of the rule's intent on banned sites.
"but it's possible you can slip up and, accidentally of course, click on a banned website and repost their material en masse after slight cleansing."
. I'm going to continue to post as you said was "adequate sourcing", RM. With acknowledgments, author's name, chapters, and page numbers. If that isn't good enough, that's all I can do. Just be ready to be spammed near death by those who want a link to a website that doesn't exist. An unfortunate situation caused by the inability to comprehend that there is no website or link to be given. Just acknowledgments of the sources used.
That's some admission, D-fendr, especially since one of the sources was your own Vatican II Canon Law excerpts. Maybe you need to express your view to your local bishop and he could relay it to his Archbishop and then he may relay it to ..... Eventually, maybe they might get around to changing the wording so that it doesn't actually say what some of you find so objectionable. You DO have that right, don't you?