Yes it does. To bad the RCC screwed up so bad by going back under the law.
>>It does not include those who create their own faith by gazing at the content of their navels.<<
I dont suppose it does. You must have met people who gaze into their navels. I havent nor have I accused anyone of doing that. Thats a nice tactic from those who run out of support for their faith but it sure looks immature to me.
Yes it does. To bad the RCC screwed up so bad by going back under the law.
Actually, we went under the Commandments of Christ, not the Law.
>>It does not include those who create their own faith by gazing at the content of their navels.<<
I dont suppose it does. You must have met people who gaze into their navels. I havent nor have I accused anyone of doing that. Thats a nice tactic from those who run out of support for their faith but it sure looks immature to me.
It sure is immature. I have met many. When I question in depth, they retreat to the point where they in effect admit to this strategy. There appear to be only two positions: submission to the Church, or submission to the theology of the moment. The Reformation promoted the theology of the moment.
Yes it does. To bad the RCC screwed up so bad by going back under the law.
We acknowledge the more than 50 commandments of Christ and do our best to follow them. Why is that so difficult for the children of the Reformation?