Speak for yourself. As I already told NL, I was posting the article that compared ancient pagan symbolism with that of the Catholic Church. I also showed that this was NOT fabricated information with additional sources. It's really too bad that no source BUT Roman Catholic ones are acceptable to you guys, but that is obviously too narrow and biased to be objective, as we know all too well. Your church has a history of destroying any and all "unapproved" documentation and usually the writers along with them. I thank God he saw fit to allow much to survive.
| boatbums: "This interesting site" Natural law: Your "interesting site" also claims that Jesus is really the Archangel Michael and that Moses was really the Pharoh Tutmoses II for 22 of Tutmoses' 54 year reign. It sure appears your only "standard of evidence" is that it reflects negatively on the Church. If you were a Christian you should be embarrassed and ashamed for attempting such a smear. However, it looks like you are leaning towards the Jehova's Witnesses, so I am not holding my breath. That's typical of Boatbum's and the like's posts -- they will ally themselves with anyone against the Church -- even those that claim that Jesus was the Archangel Michael. Of course, some may believe that... |
I guess your 'sing and dance to ignore oblivion" little group is now moving towards it's idea that Jesus is just the ARchangel Michael
No wonder -- always reformatting I guess, that's your group.
The fact is that your group takes pagan beliefs as its own, rejecting Christianity bit by bit until finally your group will join the Wiccans.
congratulations
| boatbums: "This interesting site" Natural law: Your "interesting site" also claims that Jesus is really the Archangel Michael and that Moses was really the Pharoh Tutmoses II for 22 of Tutmoses' 54 year reign. It sure appears your only "standard of evidence" is that it reflects negatively on the Church. If you were a Christian you should be embarrassed and ashamed for attempting such a smear. However, it looks like you are leaning towards the Jehova's Witnesses, so I am not holding my breath. That's typical of Boatbum's and the like's posts -- they will ally themselves with anyone against the Church -- even those that claim that Jesus was the Archangel Michael. Of course, some may believe that... |
I guess your 'sing and dance to ignore oblivion" little group is now moving towards it's idea that Jesus is just the ARchangel Michael
No wonder -- always reformatting I guess, that's your group.
The fact is that your group takes pagan beliefs as its own, rejecting Christianity bit by bit until finally your group will join the Wiccans.
congratulations
boatbums: It's really too bad that no source BUT Roman Catholic ones are acceptable to you guys
uh-uh, I'm sorry, but if sites that say Jesus is just the Archangel Michael is acceptable to your group, then go ahead. The rest of us Christians will just laugh at your group's descent to the oblivion it tries so hard to dance and sing away.