To: daniel1212
Just remember to read both sides of the story. Then try to weed out the biases. But remember there is your view ,my view and then the truth. We are talking about written recorded accounts with all types of biases. This all happened many moons ago. I posted to show we need to check all sources and by the grace of God we can figure something out.
Freeper Regards!
18 posted on
10/07/2011 5:43:19 AM PDT by
johngrace
(1 John 4!- which is also declared at every sunday mass.)
To: johngrace
You make some very good points.
20 posted on
10/07/2011 5:58:51 AM PDT by
Larry Lucido
(I can only be series in a parallel universe.)
To: johngrace
I did help provide both sides, and rather than biases, much of it was from official RC sources. The issue is not whether Rome provided Bible’s in the vernacular, but whether she overall allowed free access as she does now, having lost her unScriptural power to coerce obedience by carnal force (which early Prots also had to unlearn), and overall promoted the ability to read and fluency in the Bible. And the answer to that question is decidedly no.
37 posted on
10/07/2011 11:26:21 AM PDT by
daniel1212
(Our sinful deeds condemn us, but Christ's death and resurrection gains salvation. Repent +Believe)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson