Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: boatbums

After reading your very informative post, I have to agree. Spitwads, thrown when the Epistles of Paul are given any sort of Scriptural importance. To say his name is to set off a wave of vitriol and accusations. Not any more. Not here, at least. Thanks again, boatbums


976 posted on 09/05/2011 9:03:59 PM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 937 | View Replies ]


To: smvoice; MarkBsnr

Hardly — the problem occurs when one rates Paul’s words over the words of Christ. Paul’s writings are scripture, but to quote Paul’s writings in opposition to the Gospels is just wrong. And that is what many do.


981 posted on 09/05/2011 9:11:50 PM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 976 | View Replies ]

To: smvoice; boatbums
I am uncomfortable with what appears tobe the co-opting of the term Paulician.

On the other hand there HAS been a gnostic-ish denial of the good of creation by some opposed to us.

So I'm not as uncomfortable as I might be.

1,006 posted on 09/06/2011 1:50:42 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 976 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson