Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Faith: Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), from Catholic to Muslim
CNN ^ | 9/1/11 | Chris Welch

Posted on 09/02/2011 9:07:47 AM PDT by marshmallow

Minneapolis, Minnesota (CNN) –Prior to 2006, few people even knew that then-Minnesota state legislator Keith Ellison was a Muslim. Because of his English name, he said, no one thought to ask.

But five years ago, when he ran for a seat in the United States House of Representatives - a race he would go on to win - word of his religious affiliation began to spread.

“When I started running for Congress it actually took me by surprise that so many people were fascinated with me being the first Muslim in Congress,” said Ellison, a Democrat now serving his third term in the House.

“But someone said to me, ‘Look Keith, think of a person of Japanese origin running for Congress six years after Pearl Harbor–this might be a news story.’”

Though Ellison's status as the first Muslim elected to Congress is widely known, fewer are aware that he was born into a Catholic family in Detroit and was brought up attending Catholic schools.

But he said he was never comfortable with that faith.

“I just felt it was ritual and dogma,” Ellison said. “Of course, that’s not the reality of Catholicism, but it’s the reality I lived. So I just kind of lost interest and stopped going to Mass unless I was required to.”

It wasn’t until he was a student at Wayne State University in Detroit when Ellison began, “looking for other things.”

(Excerpt) Read more at religion.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Islam; Theology
KEYWORDS: blackmuslims; islam; keithellison; muslim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 4,661-4,676 next last
To: Natural Law
The ignorance of Catholic doctrine expressed on these threads is truly breathtaking in it's scope. Catholic doctrine and the Catechism is very clear that we have one redeemer and mediator; Jesus Christ. The words co-redeemer and mediatrix do not appear in the Catechism, although they do appear frequently in anti-Catholic publications and comic books by authors we are not permitted to name in this Forum. Co-Redeemer does not mean that Mary is a "co-equal" participant. It is an acknowledgment that she cooperated in our salvation by agreeing to be the vessel through which Jesus and our salvation passed. Catholics acknowledge that Mary most perfectly embodies the obedience of faith in a way we should emulate.

If there's ignorance of a doctrine here, then a good place to begin would be straightening it out within your own definitions first. This is what I found when I looked up "Co-Redemptrix".

The concept of Co-redemptrix refers to an indirect or unequal but important participation by the Blessed Virgin Mary in redemption, notably: that she gave free consent to give life to the Redeemer, to share his life, to suffer with him under the cross, to offer His sacrifice to God the Father for the sake of the redemption of mankind, and to bring about all particular post-assumption graces by way of intercession.

You're right that Mary isn't a co-equal participant, she's not a participant in our Redemption at all. She gave birth to Christ, she didn't have anything to do with His redemption of mankind. As for saying that Mary isn't called the Mediatrix by the RCC, here's some quotes for you from the Catholic Planet website. (www.catholicplanet.com)

Second Vatican Council: “Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked by the Church under the titles of Advocate, Auxiliatrix, Adjutrix and Mediatrix. This, however, is to be so understood that it neither takes away from, nor adds anything to, the dignity and efficaciousness of Christ the one Mediator.” (Lumen Gentium, n. 62.)

Pope Leo XIII: “The recourse we have to Mary in prayer follows upon the office she continuously fills by the side of the throne of God as Mediatrix of Divine grace; being by worthiness and by merit most acceptable to Him, and, therefore, surpassing in power all the angels and saints in Heaven. Now, this merciful office of hers, perhaps, appears in no other form of prayer so manifestly as it does in the Rosary. For in the Rosary all the part that Mary took as our co-Redemptress comes to us, as it were, set forth, and in such wise as though the facts were even then taking place; and this with much profit to our piety, whether in the contemplation of the succeeding sacred mysteries, or in the prayers which we speak and repeat with the lips.” (Iucunda Semper Expectatione, n. 2)

Now, what was that lie you were trying to get past about Mary not being called a Co-Redeemer?

601 posted on 09/05/2011 9:17:13 AM PDT by Avalon Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...

Yeah, there’s a big difference between Christianity and churchianity, and too many people cannot understand the difference.

I daresay that churchianity has done more to drive people from Christ than anything else Satan has come up with.


602 posted on 09/05/2011 9:18:31 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Probably


603 posted on 09/05/2011 9:19:10 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; Iscool
(hint, Calvinism is pretty much re-branded Islam). Islam is not a Trinitarian faith, because the Abrahamic Covenant from which it mutated is not Trinitarian.

Breathtaking ignorance !

Calvinism is Bible based Christianity.

Islam has nothing to do with the Abrahamic Covenant.

Allah is not the Elohim of Abraham, Isaac and Israel.

From Peter through the pen of Mark

Mark 12:28 One of the scribes came and heard them arguing,
and recognizing that He had answered them well, asked Him,
"What commandment is the foremost of all?"

Mark 12:29 Jesus answered, "The foremost is,
'HEAR, O ISRAEL! YHvH OUR ELOHIM YHvH IS ONE
Deuteronomy 6:4

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
604 posted on 09/05/2011 9:19:16 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
All posters should expect that type of behavior on "open" Religion Forum threads. Posters who engage in that behavior discredit themselves and their beliefs.

food allergies

Your reference is obviously to another Freeper, personally. It is "making it personal."

Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.

605 posted on 09/05/2011 9:20:31 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Does this apply equally to overly sensitive FReepers with food allergies?

There's a thread for that:
Catholics with celiac disease can now take the host at communion with low-gluten wafer
Monsanto's genetically-modified Eucharist (Catholic / Orthodox Caucus)
No Genetically Modified Jesus! (Important Issu!) [Catholic Caucus]

606 posted on 09/05/2011 9:21:05 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed: he's hated on seven continents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; boatbums; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; caww; ...
Sorry, my reply got cut off. I wanted to say that it is not Catholics that start these mammoth arguments on the open threads. It is mostly inflammatory remarks from a few anti-Catholic posters who get them going.

I guess you missed post 5 on THIS thread. Of all threads to make that claim on this Swiss cheese one because of that post is not the one to choose.

607 posted on 09/05/2011 9:21:20 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; boatbums; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; caww; ...
And yet some say 'come home'! LOL! What a confused group - they don't know what they want - other than being in control.

Right. *Come home* but in the meantime, you'd better NOT show your face on one of our caucus threads or you're toast, buddy.

608 posted on 09/05/2011 9:23:17 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; Religion Moderator
Space aliens gave us Scripture? Where? When? Where is the documentation?

I realize that the RM isn't going to delve into denominational debates, but blatant falsehoods in the name of smearing a Christian's witness should not be allowed in the Religion Forum wouldn't you think? Quix has never advocated this lie that you're propagating, but you see no problem with repeating it. And you Catholics wonder why everyone else thinks you guys are hypocrites and liars when it comes to the Truth.

As the old saying goes, either establish this as a fact with two or more witnesses or be called out for a liar and deceiver just like your Father was. Figs don't come from Thistles.

609 posted on 09/05/2011 9:24:51 AM PDT by Avalon Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: Quix; metmom

What these stats prove is that when scripture becomes just one more “truth” among many the creeds have no power ...


610 posted on 09/05/2011 9:25:15 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
>>Did it become obvious to you who looks for any excuse to disagree with or criticize Catholics, and did it become obvious how ignorant they were?<<

NO, I did notice that it was the Catholics who most often rely on the RCC organization rather then Christ.

611 posted on 09/05/2011 9:25:26 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: Avalon Hussar
This is what I found when I looked up "Co-Redemptrix".

Add this:

....let’s look at some people who have in fact called the Virgin Mary the Co-redemptrix: John Paul II (on six different occasions); Bl. Mother Teresa of Calcutta; St. Padre Pio, stigmatic wonder worker of the 20th century; Sr. Lucia, the Fatima visionary; St. Francis Cabrini, the first American citizen to be canonized; St. Jose Maria Escriva, founder of the Opus Dei; St. Edith Stein, co-patroness of Europe; papal theologians Cardinals Ciappiand Cottier; contemporary Church leaders such as Cardinal Schönborn, General Secretary of the Catechism of the Catholic Church; Mother Angelica, foundress of worldwide Catholic television and radio network EWTN; and a host of other saints, popes, mystics, prelates, theologians, doctors of the Church, and lay leaders, with an ecclesial line of succession dating back to the 14th century.

Do we see dangerous extremism, heresy, or any anti-ecumenical spirit in people like John Paul II and Mother Teresa? Would saints like Padre Pio and Mother Cabrini participate in Marian excess to the detriment of Jesus and his Church? Would Cristoph Cardinal Schönborn, general editor of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, use and defend the Co-redemptrix title if it were in any way unorthodox or theologically questionable? Would a Fatima visionary use, explain and defend the Co-redemptrix title six times in her last great writing, Calls from the Message of Fatima, when doing so would be offensive to the Holy See, who granted the imprimatur to her book? Or, even more, to Our Lady herself, with whom Sr. Lucia experienced direct mystical communications for decades?

Why, then, would we fear calling Mary the Co-redemptrix with Jesus, the divine Redeemer of humanity, when these pontiffs, saints, theologians and mystics for the past 700 years have done so?
-- from the thread Are You Afraid of Mary “Co-redemptrix”?


612 posted on 09/05/2011 9:26:15 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed: he's hated on seven continents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Avalon Hussar; Religion Moderator

C0 in Latin means “with”

The Blessed Virgin Mary came bearing the child Jesus.

The Blessed Virgin Mary came “with” the Son of God and Son of Man within her womb.

Hope that clarifies your misinformation. BTW, I don’t think you offered sources (Live-Links) for all that.

What I am posting is common Latin language knowledge.


613 posted on 09/05/2011 9:26:21 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; Avalon Hussar
So sorry it's nearly taken your breath away, NL. The ignorance of Catholic doctrine expressed on these threads must surely keep you awake at night. Wanting nothing more than true understanding of what we non-catholics read regarding your Catholic doctrine and Catechism. Perhaps you could shed some light on your Catechism numbers 494,963-973. That would be Mary as Co-Redeemer. Or your Catechism 968-971,975,2673-2682. That would be Mary as the Mediatress of All Grace.

Not to mention Catholic teachings on Mary, and Vatican Councils coming up with new and improved Mary teachings.

THe words co-redeemer and mediatrix do not appear in the Catechism? Is that right? However they DO appear in Catholic teachings. I have a whole list right in front of me.

614 posted on 09/05/2011 9:26:23 AM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
C0 in Latin means “with” The Blessed Virgin Mary came bearing the child Jesus. The Blessed Virgin Mary came “with” the Son of God and Son of Man within her womb. Hope that clarifies your misinformation. BTW, I don’t think you offered sources (Live-Links) for all that. What I am posting is common Latin language knowledge.

You're correct that I forgot my link, so here it is. Sorry about that.

However, while I agree with what you've posted here, that doesn't begin to cover what the Catholic Church attempts to teach about Mary. Like I said, I have no problem venerating her, just don't worship her as co-redeemer, which is what the RCC seems to be teaching.

615 posted on 09/05/2011 9:31:12 AM PDT by Avalon Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; CynicalBear; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...
Many of the "Christians" here are followers of Paul, not Christ.

Baseless opinion, nothing more.

It's simply justification for condemning Protestantism as a whole.

It is rather ironic and hypocritical from people who follow a man themselves, Peter to be exact.

Catholics are so ingrained with the following a religious leader mentality, that it's clearly beyond their comprehension that someone can follow Christ alone, and have faith in Him without someone holding their hand.

616 posted on 09/05/2011 9:33:33 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: Avalon Hussar
"Blatant falsehoods" in religious debate are in the eye of the beholder and therefore cannot be banned on "open" Religion Forum threads.

For example, to one Freeper the statement "Catholics worship Mary" is absolute truth but to another it is a damnable lie.

617 posted on 09/05/2011 9:33:33 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

**taxpayer supported.**

Yikes. I didn’t think about that. Of course, it’s true. A lot of “tax-paying” people would be upset to know about the full time Muslim and the sound-proof room they get vs. the ones for Catholics and Christian denominations. Me among them!

Plus the treatment of women by Muslims just horrifies me.


618 posted on 09/05/2011 9:33:36 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Nobody’s ever been toasted. Of course, some deathless protestant prose HAS been deleted. Oh, the humanity!


619 posted on 09/05/2011 9:34:16 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Much of what has been definitively defined as doctrine by the Church came about because of heresy. When such heretical beliefs became widespread or threatened orthodoxy, the Church had to move to make a final declaration of Truth.

It has been thus from the very beginning and it is why an authority is necessary to protect orthodoxy.


620 posted on 09/05/2011 9:35:11 AM PDT by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 4,661-4,676 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson