Hard Evidence for The Book of Mormon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A_37TXgbxk
The Book of Mormon vs. DNA Research
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIG8Aj5Vqdk&feature=related
“Hard Evidence for The Book of Mormon”
Whoa! Better fix that!
“IT’s Hard to find the first shred of Evidence for The Book of Mormon”
Think of how silly this video is Resty. The mormonic video author
CLAIMS that the “Nahom” in the Book of Mormon is the settlement
in the Holy Land. No real evidence, other than the coincidence
of the consonants NHM and then assumption they are Nahom.
Not surprisingly, non-mormon scholars (the real kind), think this
is just one more wild claim of mormonism.
-—> There is no evidence dating the settlement of NHM before A.D. 600, which makes it a huge stretch.
-—> No one knows how NHM is pronounced, which makes it pure speculation.
That “hard evidence” is as hard as a brown banana!
Hard Evidence for The Book of Mormon
- - - -
Any of that by non-LDS scholars? Because I don’t know any archeologist who takes the ‘book of Mormon’ seriously.
Come SEE!