Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark; Iscool
What is your point? That, because we do not have the original manuscripts of the Gospels, we should disregard them?

We have copies of the New Testament from the second, third, fourth centuries. There is no reason to believe that they are substantially changed from the first century originals.

Not one of them which is identical. You have no more idea than I what the exact wording was.

286 posted on 06/14/2011 4:16:04 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE
"You have no more idea than I what the exact wording was."

That admission of Scriptural cluelessness was both unexpected and refreshing. Absent a teaching authority you are pretty much doomed to fumbling along blindly, lashing out at others until your day of reckoning.

288 posted on 06/14/2011 4:31:52 PM PDT by Natural Law (For God so loved the world He did not send a book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]

To: OLD REGGIE; iowamark; Natural Law
You have no more idea than I what the exact wording was.

iowamark -- and remember this is anti-"sola scriptura" yet arguing on the basis of ss -- talk of contradictory!!

300 posted on 06/14/2011 11:27:51 PM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson