Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: one Lord one faith one baptism

If “your religion” had held to the religion of it’s own church fathers, there would have been no need for a Reformation and no disunity of the body of believers.

Sola Scriptura arose in response to the bizarre and oftentimes moneygrubbing excesses and corruption then extant in “your religion.” These were cast off by the Reformers, who determined never again to accept unscriptural excess and corruption such as occurred in the medieval nightmare known as the Roman Catholic Church of the era.

The Scriptures were written by Jews who believed in Jesus Christ as Messiah. To engage in revisionist history by reaching back and claiming the Apostles as Roman Catholic is yet another bizarre excess. Hubris, that’s what it is. “Your religion” did not author the Bible. Those early Church Fathers who had a hand in compiling that same Bible are oftentimes refuted in the modern era by “your religion.”

This sort of thing is why Sola Scriptura ever became necessary. It’s also why it’s attacked by those who adhere to a religion that has veered from it’s own Apostolic and Scriptural roots.


351 posted on 05/22/2011 6:46:52 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

my friend, what you call hubris, everyone else calls history.

i can understand you rejecting the Catholic Faith, people rejected Jesus when He walked the earth. what i can’t understand is how sola scriptura has led to 30,000 “churches”. why do we need the baptists, if we have the lutherans. the lutherans hold to sola scriptura, why can’t the baptists be lutheran?

no my friend, read John 17, this isn’t what Jesus prayed for.
the Holy Spirit is not the author of confusion.


353 posted on 05/22/2011 6:58:55 AM PDT by one Lord one faith one baptism (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...
Sola Scriptura arose in response to the bizarre and oftentimes moneygrubbing excesses and corruption then extant in “your religion.” These were cast off by the Reformers, who determined never again to accept unscriptural excess and corruption such as occurred in the medieval nightmare known as the Roman Catholic Church of the era.

And for wanting to eliminate greed, immorality, and corruption, the Reformers were what? Ex-communicated and burned at the stake. And they're still being vilified today.

Seems that some in those days weren't interested a good house cleaning and giving up what must have been a pretty good deal for themselves.

507 posted on 05/22/2011 6:44:15 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry; one Lord one faith one baptism
Actually, Sola Scriptura is used to justify a lot of different things. You need to ask what does Sola scriptura define

  1. does sola scriptura say one should believe in something as basic as Jesus was always God (Trinitarian position) or that Jesus Christ was man made God (Oneness PENTECOSTAL Protestant position) or the Angel Michael (Seventh Day Adventist Ellen G White teaching)
  2. Does sola scriptura say that there is the REAL Presence of Christ in the Eucharist (Lutheran, some Anglicans, maybe even Methodists), or is it just a symbol (Calvinists)
  3. Does sola scriptura say that one MUST talk in tongues (Oneness Pentecostal) to display faith or not?
  4. Does sola scriptura say that there should be an episcopate (Lutheran, Anglican) or not (Presbyterians)?
  5. Does sola scriptura say that apostolic succession is important (Anglican) or not (others)?
  6. Does sola scriptura say that Baptism is for infants and sufficient (Presbyterian etc.) or not (Baptists)?
  7. Does sola scriptura say that God pre-damns people to hell (Calvinism) or not (others)?
  8. Does sola scriptura say that vestements are ok (or in the silly words of one poster allowing men in dresses and silly hats) (Anglicans, Lutherans, some Methodists, Presbyterians, even Baptists and Pentecostals) or not?
  9. Does sola scriptura say that Jesus came only for the salvation of a few (Calvinists) or he was Savior of the world (everyone else)?
  10. Does sola scriptura agree or disagree with soul sleep? (Calvin: "As long as (the soul) is in the body it exerts its own powers; but when it quits this prison-house it returns to God, whose presence, it meanwhile enjoys while it rests in the hope of a blessed Resurrection. This rest is its paradise. On the other hand, the spirit of the reprobate, while it waits for the dreadful judgment, is tortured by that anticipation. . .", Psychopannychia,
  11. Does sola scriptura agree or disagree with worshipping on a Sunday (Presbyterians, Pentecostals etc.) or not (Seventh Day Adventists)
  12. Does sola scriptura agree with the Adventists that one should follow kosher laws or not?
  13. Does sola scriptura believe that we still have spiritual gifts like prophecy amongst us (Pentecostals) or not (Presbyterians)
  14. Does sola scriptura agree with being "slain in the spirit" (Pentecostalism) or not (Presbyterianism, Lutheranism etc)
  15. Does sola scriptura say that Regeneration comes through Baptism (Lutheranism) or not (Baptists)
  16. Does sola scriptura say that grace can be resisted (Pentecostalism, Lutheranism, Methodism) or not (Calvinism)
  17. Does sola scriptura say that baptism is three-fold (Mennonites) or not?
  18. Does sola scriptura say that there is no free will (Calvinism) or that man has free will (Mennonites)
  19. Does sola scriptura say that it is faith + works (Mennonites: Menno Simons told the followers of Luther and Calvin: “If you wish to be saved, you must walk in the way of the Lord, hear His Word, and obey it. For nothing avails in heaven nor on earth unto salvation, … not even Christ with His grace, merit, blood, and death, if we are not born of God, … if we do not believe His Word sincerely, and if we do not walk in the light and do right. As John says: …>If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie.’” (Complete Writings of Menno Simons, p. 208)) or not?
  20. Does sola scriptura say that there is imputed righteousness (Calvinism) or not (Mennonites)

These are fundamental differences my friend

541 posted on 05/23/2011 1:24:34 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry; one Lord one faith one baptism
The Apostles were indeed Jews who believed in Jesus Christ as the Messiah, as Lord and GOD. The very fact that they acknowledged Him as God separated them from the Sadduccees, Pharisees, Essenes etc.

They were in this essence Christians as distinct from Jews

542 posted on 05/23/2011 1:26:58 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry; one Lord one faith one baptism
Furthermore, quite frankly, the New Testament Church, the Early Christians believed in:
  1. Baptism for the remission of sins
  2. the Eucharist as the body and blood of Christ

We in orthodoxy believe this, just as the New Testament Church and the Early Christians did -- do you?

543 posted on 05/23/2011 1:36:43 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry; one Lord one faith one baptism
Now remember the Bible is utterly accurate, yet, besides as shown above not giving the exact meaning of certain points, it does not say a lot about some things either - how did Early Christians worship? What were the rules for this worship, the manner in which this worship was carried out?

The Bible does not say anything about this, yet we have an external work dating from 70 AD (Apostolic times), the Didache which does just that (in fact it possibly predates Revelations)

What does it say?

And this is how we worship today, just as we were taught right back to the Apostles (1 Tim 3:15 15But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.)

544 posted on 05/23/2011 1:37:14 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson